Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons
- PMID: 18407311
- DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.006
Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons
Abstract
In singleton feature search for a form-defined target, the presentation of a task-irrelevant, but salient singleton color distractor is known to interfere with target detection [Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184-193; Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606]. The present study was designed to re-examine this effect, by presenting observers with a singleton form target (on each trial) that could be accompanied by a salient) singleton color distractor, with the proportion of distractor to no-distractor trials systematically varying across blocks of trials. In addition to RTs, eye movements were recorded in order to examine the mechanisms underlying the distractor interference effect. The results showed that singleton distractors did interfere with target detection only when they were presented on a relatively small (but not on a large) proportion of trials. Overall, the findings suggest that cross-dimensional interference is a covert attention effect, arising from the competition of the target with the distractor for attentional selection [Kumada, T., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Cross-dimensional interference and cross-trial inhibition. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 493-503], with the strength of the competition being modulated by observers' (top-down) incentive to suppress the distractor dimension.
Similar articles
-
Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.1. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009. PMID: 19170466
-
Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.Vision Res. 2008 May;48(10):1274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.021. Epub 2008 Apr 18. Vision Res. 2008. PMID: 18395767
-
Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.Vision Res. 2005 Jun;45(14):1885-99. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.007. Vision Res. 2005. PMID: 15797778
-
A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention.Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):836-63. doi: 10.1037/a0013395. Psychol Rev. 2008. PMID: 18954206 Review.
-
Surface color perception in three-dimensional scenes.Vis Neurosci. 2006 May-Aug;23(3-4):311-21. doi: 10.1017/S0952523806233431. Vis Neurosci. 2006. PMID: 16961962 Review.
Cited by
-
An adaptive view of attentional control.Am Psychol. 2021 Dec;76(9):1410-1422. doi: 10.1037/amp0000917. Am Psychol. 2021. PMID: 35266739 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The persistence of value-driven attention capture is task-dependent.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Feb;85(2):315-341. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02621-0. Epub 2023 Jan 6. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023. PMID: 36609677 Free PMC article.
-
Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 18;39(38):7591-7603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2740-18.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 6. J Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31387915 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of prevalence on distractor speeded search termination.Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):303-311. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02337-8. Epub 2023 Aug 14. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024. PMID: 37580452
-
Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes.Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 2;11(1):13761. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93335-0. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34215819 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources