A comparison between ventilation modes: how does activity level affect energy expenditure estimates?
- PMID: 18407911
- DOI: 10.1177/0148607108314761
A comparison between ventilation modes: how does activity level affect energy expenditure estimates?
Abstract
Background: An appropriate diet is essential to avoid complications of overfeeding or underfeeding in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The paucity of consistent comparative data on energy expenditure for each ventilation mode complicates diet prescription. This study evaluates caloric requirements by comparing estimated and measured energy expenditure values for 2 ventilation modes.
Methods: The energy expenditure of 100 ICU patients on assisted or controlled mechanical ventilation was measured by indirect calorimetry for 20 minutes. Values were calculated for a 24-hour period and compared with Harris-Benedict estimates multiplied by an injury factor and either multiplied or not by a 10% activity factor.
Results: The mean Harris-Benedict estimate was 1858.87 +/- 488.67 kcal/24 h when multiplied by an injury factor and a 10% activity factor. The mean energy expenditure values measured by indirect calorimetry were 1712.76 +/- 491.95 kcal/24 h for controlled and 1867.33 +/- 542.67 kcal/24 h for assisted ventilation. The mean total energy expenditure for assisted ventilation was 10.71% greater than the mean for controlled ventilation (P < .001). For controlled ventilation, Harris-Benedict results overestimated indirect calorimetry values by 141.10 +/- 10 kcal/24 h (8.2%, P = .012) when multiplied by injury and activity factors, and underestimated values by 44.28 +/- 28 kcal/24 h (2.6%, P = .399) when the equation was calculated without the activity factor. For assisted ventilation, Harris-Benedict results underestimated indirect calorimetry values by 198.84 +/- 84 kcal/24 h (10.7%, P = .001) when not multiplied by the activity factor and by 13.46 kcal/24 h (0.75%) when the activity factor was used, but differences were not statistically significant (P = .829).
Conclusions: Results suggest that a 10% activity factor should be adopted only for assisted ventilation because multiplication by an activity factor may lead to overfeeding of patients on controlled ventilation.
Similar articles
-
Accurate determination of energy needs in hospitalized patients.J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Mar;107(3):393-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.12.014. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007. PMID: 17324656
-
Comparison of measured versus predicted energy requirements in critically ill cancer patients.Respir Care. 2009 Apr;54(4):487-94. Respir Care. 2009. PMID: 19327184
-
Comparison of resting energy expenditure prediction methods with measured resting energy expenditure in obese, hospitalized adults.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009 Mar-Apr;33(2):168-75. doi: 10.1177/0148607108327192. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009. PMID: 19251910
-
Energy requirements in frail elderly people: a review of the literature.Clin Nutr. 2007 Feb;26(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Oct 10. Clin Nutr. 2007. PMID: 17034905 Review.
-
Indirect calorimetry measurements in the ventilated critically ill patient: facts and controversies--the heat is on.Crit Care Clin. 2010 Oct;26(4):e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2010.08.001. Crit Care Clin. 2010. PMID: 20970041 Review.
Cited by
-
Metabolic support of the obese intensive care unit patient: a current perspective.Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2010 Mar;13(2):184-91. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328335f1e6. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2010. PMID: 20040861 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Energy expenditure and indirect calorimetry in critical illness and convalescence: current evidence and practical considerations.J Intensive Care. 2021 Jan 12;9(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00524-0. J Intensive Care. 2021. PMID: 33436084 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical