Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jul;95(2):527-39.
doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.127399. Epub 2008 Apr 11.

Dynamics of cellular focal adhesions on deformable substrates: consequences for cell force microscopy

Affiliations

Dynamics of cellular focal adhesions on deformable substrates: consequences for cell force microscopy

Alice Nicolas et al. Biophys J. 2008 Jul.

Abstract

Cell focal adhesions are micrometer-sized aggregates of proteins that anchor the cell to the extracellular matrix. Within the cell, these adhesions are connected to the contractile, actin cytoskeleton; this allows the adhesions to transmit forces to the surrounding matrix and makes the adhesion assembly sensitive to the rigidity of their environment. In this article, we predict the dynamics of focal adhesions as a function of the rigidity of the substrate. We generalize previous theories and include the fact that the dynamics of proteins that adsorb to adhesions are also driven by their coupling to cell contractility and the deformation of the matrix. We predict that adhesions reach a finite size that is proportional to the elastic compliance of the substrate, on a timescale that also scales with the compliance: focal adhesions quickly reach a relatively small, steady-state size on soft materials. However, their apparent sliding is not sensitive to the rigidity of the substrate. We also suggest some experimental probes of these ideas and discuss the nature of information that can be extracted from cell force microscopy on deformable substrates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The two-layer model: linker proteins in the upper layer connect the acto-myosin stress fibers and the mechanosensitive, lower layer that is anchored to the substrate via integrins.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The lower layer is deformed by the tangential component of the stress, formula image that acts along the dash-dot line. The rods have no molecular significance but help to visualize the deformation of the molecular units. The stress-induced tilt is not uniform in the layer, giving rise to a nonzero gradient of tilt.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Solution of Eq. 11 for the dynamics of the density profile of the linker proteins for a cell on a rigid substrate. The stress pulls on the FA from left to right. The FA grows and slides for this choice of parameters: μbulk = −2.7 kBT, ΔG = 2.5 kBT, εB = 30 kBT, λxz = 40 kBT/a3, J = 4.2 kBT, h = 2a, d = 0.23a, and τ = 2 kBT.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Growth dynamics of FAs assuming a stiff substrate with velocities at the front (vf) and back (vb) edges of the cluster of linker proteins, together with the sliding velocity vsliding = (vf + vb)/2 and the growth velocity vgrowth = vfvb, as a function of the stress f per unit of thermal stress 1/βa3. On the left-hand side, βτ = 0.5, is chosen so that the velocity at the back edge is in the direction opposite that of the stress. On the right-hand side, βτ = 2 and the back edge always moves in the direction of the stress. The sketches below the graph depict the direction of the velocities at the edges of a focal adhesion as a function of the stress, f. We have chosen μbulk = −2.7 kBT, ΔG = 2.5 kBT, εB = 30 kBT, λxz = 40 kBT/a3 (this corresponds to 0.7 kPa ≤ λxz ≤ 20 kPa for 20 nm ≤ a ≤ 60 nm (25), J = 4.2 kBT, h = 2a, d = 0.23a).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Growth velocity for a stress f = 10 kBT/a3 as a function of the rigidity of the substrate for three sizes, L, of the adhesion: L = 10a (—), L = 100a (– – –), and L = 1000a (– · –). The other parameters are the same as in Fig. 4. For a substrate with rigidity Λxz, the adhesion shrinks (vgrowth < 0) when its size exceeds a threshold that is proportional to 1/Λxz (see Eq. 18).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Engler, A., L. Bacakova, C. Newman, A. Hategan, M. Griffin, and D. Discher. 2004. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys. J. 86:617–628. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Engler, A. J., S. Sen, H. L. Sweeney, and D. E. Discher. 2006. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 126:677–689. - PubMed
    1. Balaban, N. Q., U. S. Schwarz, D. Riveline, P. Goichberg, G. Tzur, I. Sabanay, D. Mahalu, S. A. Safran, A. Bershadsky, L. Addadi, and B. Geiger. 2001. Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:466–472. - PubMed
    1. Goffin, J. M., P. Pittet, G. Csucs, J. W. Lussi, J.-J. Meister, and B. Hinz. 2006. Focal adhesion size controls tension-dependent recruitment of α-smooth muscle actin to stress fibers. J. Cell Biol. 172:259–268. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Merkel, R., N. Kirchgessner, C. M. Cesa, and B. Hoffmann. 2007. Cell force microscopy on elastic layers of finite thickness. Biophys. J. 93:3314–3323. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources