Proteasome inhibitors increase tubulin polymerization and stabilization in tissue culture cells: a possible mechanism contributing to peripheral neuropathy and cellular toxicity following proteasome inhibition
- PMID: 18414063
- PMCID: PMC9416319
- DOI: 10.4161/cc.7.7.5625
Proteasome inhibitors increase tubulin polymerization and stabilization in tissue culture cells: a possible mechanism contributing to peripheral neuropathy and cellular toxicity following proteasome inhibition
Abstract
Bortezomib (Velcade((R))), a proteasome inhibitor, is approved by the FDA for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). While effective, its use has been hampered by peripheral neurotoxicity of unexplained etiology. Since proteasome inhibitors alter protein degradation, we speculated that proteins regulating microtubule (MT) stability may be affected after treatment and examined MT polymerization in cells by comparing the distribution of tubulin between polymerized (P) and soluble (S) fractions. We observed increased MT polymerization following treatment of SY5Y and KCNR [neuroblastoma], HCN2, and 8226 [MM] cells, using five proteasome inhibitors; the baseline proportion of total alpha-tubulin in 'P' fractions ranged from approximately 41-68%, and increased to approximately 55-99% after treatment. Increased acetylated alpha-tubulin, a post-translational marker of stabilized MTs, was observed in the neural cell lines HCN1A and HCN2 and this was sustained up to 144 hours after the proteasome inhibitor was removed. Cell cycle analysis of three cell lines after treatment, showed approximately 50-75% increases in the G(2)M phase. Immunofluorescent localization studies of proteasome inhibitor treated cells did not reveal microtubule bundles in contrast to paclitaxel treated, suggesting MT stabilization via a mechanism other than direct drug binding. We examined the levels of microtubule associated proteins and observed a 1.4-3.7 fold increase in the microtubule associated protein MAP2, in HCN2 cells following treatment with proteasome inhibitors. These data provide a plausible explanation for the neurotoxicity observed clinically and raise the possibility that microtubule stabilization contributes to cytotoxicity.
Figures
References
-
- Goldberg AL, Akopian TN, Kisselev AF, Lee DH. Protein degradation by the proteasome and direction of its in vivo importance with synthetic inhibitors. Mol Biol Rep 1997; 24:69–75. - PubMed
-
- Goldberg AL, Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature 2003; 426:895–9. - PubMed
-
- Coux O, Tanaka K, Goldberg AL. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu Rev Biochem 1996; 65:801–47. - PubMed
-
- Schmidt M, Hanna J, Elsasser S, Finley D. Proteasome-associated proteins: regulation of a proteolytic machine. Biol Chem 2005; 386:725–37. - PubMed
-
- Glickman MH, Ciechanav A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev 2002; 82:373–428. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical