Asymmetry of the face in orthodontic patients
- PMID: 18416611
- DOI: 10.2319/022107-85.1
Asymmetry of the face in orthodontic patients
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the laterality of the normal asymmetry of the human face, examining differences in laterality in relation to sex, growth stage, and skeletal classification.
Materials and methods: A total of 1800 Japanese subjects (651 males and 1149 females; mean age, 15 years 3 months; range, 4 years 2 months to 59 years 11 months) were selected. Individuals in the sample were categorized according to sex, one of three growth stages, and one of three skeletal patterns. Differences in length between distances from the points at which ear rods were inserted to the facial midline and the perpendicular distance from the soft-tissue menton to the facial midline were measured on a frontal facial photograph. Subjects with a discrepancy of more than 3 standard deviations of the measurement error were categorized as having left- or right-sided laterality.
Results: Of subjects with facial asymmetry, 79.7% had a wider right hemiface, and 79.3% of those with chin deviation had left-sided laterality. These tendencies were independent of sex, age, or skeletal jaw relationships. In this regard, during pubertal growth, the proportion of subjects with wider right hemiface decreased (P < .0001), whereas the proportion of those with a wider left hemiface increased (P < .01), despite a consistent tendency for right-sided dominance.
Conclusion: These results suggest that laterality in the normal asymmetry of the face, which is consistently found in humans, is likely to be a hereditary rather than an acquired trait.
Similar articles
-
Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.Eur J Orthod. 2007 Dec;29(6):648-53. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm073. Epub 2007 Sep 18. Eur J Orthod. 2007. PMID: 17878186
-
Novel method of 3-dimensional soft-tissue analysis for Class III patients.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Dec;138(6):758-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.033. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010. PMID: 21130335
-
The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.Angle Orthod. 1991 Fall;61(3):205-10. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061<0205:TVOSCD>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1991. PMID: 1928822
-
[Glossoplasty: hope and pre-orthodontic support?].Orthod Fr. 1992;63 Pt 2:455-68. Orthod Fr. 1992. PMID: 1341732 Review. French.
-
[The occlusal plane in Class I and Class II malocclusion: its relation to craniofacial variables].Orthod Fr. 1988;59 Pt 2:383-93. Orthod Fr. 1988. PMID: 3078360 Review. French. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Laterality and Left-sidedness in the Nose, Face, and Body: A New Finding.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Dec 28;5(12):e1590. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001590. eCollection 2017 Dec. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017. PMID: 29632770 Free PMC article.
-
Mandibular asymmetries and associated factors in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients.Angle Orthod. 2018 Sep;88(5):545-551. doi: 10.2319/111517-785.1. Epub 2018 Apr 18. Angle Orthod. 2018. PMID: 29667467 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional quantification of facial symmetry in adolescents using laser surface scanning.Eur J Orthod. 2014 Apr;36(2):125-32. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr091. Epub 2011 Jul 27. Eur J Orthod. 2014. PMID: 21795753 Free PMC article.
-
Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Cranial Base Structure in Patients with Facial Asymmetry.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 22;14(1):24. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010024. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38201333 Free PMC article.
-
Facial asymmetry revisited: Part I- diagnosis and treatment planning.J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018 Jan-Apr;8(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 May 15. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018. PMID: 29556456 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources