Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr 16:8:21.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-21.

Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt

Affiliations

Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt

Salla Atkins et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: Qualitative synthesis has become more commonplace in recent years. Meta-ethnography is one of several methods for synthesising qualitative research and is being used increasingly within health care research. However, many aspects of the steps in the process remain ill-defined.

Discussion: We utilized the seven stages of the synthesis process to synthesise qualitative research on adherence to tuberculosis treatment. In this paper we discuss the methodological and practical challenges faced; of particular note are the methods used in our synthesis, the additional steps that we found useful in clarifying the process, and the key methodological challenges encountered in implementing the meta-ethnographic approach. The challenges included shaping an appropriate question for the synthesis; identifying relevant studies; assessing the quality of the studies; and synthesising findings across a very large number of primary studies from different contexts and research traditions. We offer suggestions that may assist in undertaking meta-ethnographies in the future.

Summary: Meta-ethnography is a useful method for synthesising qualitative research and for developing models that interpret findings across multiple studies. Despite its growing use in health research, further research is needed to address the wide range of methodological and epistemological questions raised by the approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lloyd Jones M. Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004;48:271–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03196.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mays N., Pope, C Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal. 2000;320:50–52. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McEwan MJ., Espie, CA, Metcalfe, J A systematic review of the contribution of qualitative research to the study of quality of life in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Seizure. 2004;13:3–14. doi: 10.1016/S1059-1311(03)00081-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R. Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7:209–215. doi: 10.1258/135581902320432732. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10:6–20. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308576. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types