Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes
- PMID: 18423758
- PMCID: PMC2704565
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.100
Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes
Abstract
Purpose: The prognostic significance and optimal management of positive surgical margins following partial nephrectomy remain ill-defined. We combine data from 2 tertiary care intuitions, and report predictors of positive surgical margins and long-term oncological outcomes for patients with positive surgical margins.
Materials and methods: Clinical, pathological and followup data on 1,344 patients undergoing 1,390 partial nephrectomies for kidney cancer were analyzed. Patients with positive surgical margins on final pathology were treated expectantly. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were fit to determine clinicopathological features associated with positive surgical margins. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate freedom from local disease recurrence and metastatic progression. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess whether positive surgical margin predicted local recurrence or metastatic disease adjusting for tumor size, pathological stage, histological subtype and presence of a solitary kidney.
Results: Positive surgical margins were documented in 77 cases (5.5%). Decreasing tumor size and presence of a solitary kidney carried a significantly higher risk of positive surgical margins. The overall 10-year probability of freedom from local disease recurrence was 93% (95% CI 89, 95) and from metastatic progression 93% (95% CI 90, 95), with no significant difference between patients with positive vs negative margins (p = 0.97 and 0.18, respectively). Positive surgical margins were not associated with an increased risk of local recurrence or metastatic disease.
Conclusions: Positive surgical margins in partial nephrectomy specimens do not uniformly portend an adverse prognosis. While every effort should be taken to ensure clear margins, our data suggest that select patients with a positive surgical margin can be safely offered vigilant monitoring without compromising long-term disease-free survival.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors report no potential conflicts of interest
Figures
Comment in
-
Who will fail local therapy for renal cell carcinoma.J Urol. 2008 Jun;179(6):2087-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.124. Epub 2008 Apr 18. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18423686 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Positive surgical margin following radical nephrectomy is an independent predictor of local recurrence and disease-specific survival.World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov 2;15(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1257-6. World J Surg Oncol. 2017. PMID: 29096642 Free PMC article.
-
Positive Surgical Margins Increase Risk of Recurrence after Partial Nephrectomy for High Risk Renal Tumors.J Urol. 2016 Aug;196(2):327-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.075. Epub 2016 Feb 19. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 26907508 Free PMC article.
-
Positive surgical margins in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of oncologic outcomes (leave no tumor behind).J Urol. 2013 Nov;190(5):1674-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.110. Epub 2013 Jun 11. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23764077
-
Utility of frozen section analysis of resection margins during partial nephrectomy.Urology. 2004 Jul;64(1):31-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.011. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15245928 Review.
-
Partial nephrectomy: technique, complications and pathological findings.J Urol. 1995 Oct;154(4):1312-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66845-9. J Urol. 1995. PMID: 7658526 Review.
Cited by
-
Predictors of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: A large single-center experience.Turk J Urol. 2019 Jan 1;45(1):17-21. doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.57767. Print 2019 Nov. Turk J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30668306 Free PMC article.
-
Oncologic outcomes of patients with positive surgical margin after partial nephrectomy: a 25-year single institution experience.World J Urol. 2018 Jul;36(7):1093-1101. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2241-7. Epub 2018 Feb 27. World J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29488096
-
Partial Nephrectomy, a Comparison between Different Modalities: A Tertiary Care Center Experience.J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2021 Jun 17;8(2):34-39. doi: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v8i2.179. eCollection 2021. J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2021. PMID: 34178584 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of survival and renal function between partial and radical laparoscopic nephrectomy for T1b renal cell carcinoma.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;146(1):261-272. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03058-z. Epub 2019 Nov 1. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31677114 Free PMC article.
-
Positive surgical margins may not affect the survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma after partial nephrectomy: A meta-analysis based on 39 studies.Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;12:945166. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.945166. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36033492 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Patard JJ, Shvarts O, Lam JS, Pantuck AJ, Kim HL, Ficarra V, et al. Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol. 2004;171:2181. - PubMed
-
- Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 2004;171:1066. - PubMed
-
- Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Blute ML. Complications of contemporary open nephron sparing surgery: a single institution experience. J Urol. 2005;174:855. - PubMed
-
- Lau WK, Blute ML, Weaver AL, Torres VE, Zincke H. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:1236. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical