Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Apr;115(2):336-56.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.

An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance

Affiliations
Review

An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance

Toni Schmader et al. Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Research showing that activation of negative stereotypes can impair the performance of stigmatized individuals on a wide variety of tasks has proliferated. However, a complete understanding of the processes underlying these stereotype threat effects on behavior is still lacking. The authors examine stereotype threat in the context of research on stress arousal, vigilance, working memory, and self-regulation to develop a process model of how negative stereotypes impair performance on cognitive and social tasks that require controlled processing, as well as sensorimotor tasks that require automatic processing. The authors argue that stereotype threat disrupts performance via 3 distinct, yet interrelated, mechanisms: (a) a physiological stress response that directly impairs prefrontal processing, (b) a tendency to actively monitor performance, and (c) efforts to suppress negative thoughts and emotions in the service of self-regulation. These mechanisms combine to consume executive resources needed to perform well on cognitive and social tasks. The active monitoring mechanism disrupts performance on sensorimotor tasks directly. Empirical evidence for these assertions is reviewed, and implications for interventions designed to alleviate stereotype threat are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Stereotype threat as a cognitive imbalance triggered by person and/or situation factors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ambady N, Gray HM. On being sad and mistaken: Mood effects on the accuracy of thin-slice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;83:947–961. - PubMed
    1. Amodio DM, Devine PG, Harmon-Jones E. A dynamic model of guilt: Implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice. Psychological Science. 2007;18:524–530. - PubMed
    1. Amodio DM, Harmon-Jones E, Devine PG, Curtin JJ, Hartely SL, Covert AE. Neural signals for the detection of unintentional race bias. Psychological Science. 2004;15:88–93. - PubMed
    1. Amodio DM, Kubota JT, Harmon-Jones E, Devine PG. Alternative mechanisms for regulating racial responses according to internal vs. external cues. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2006;1:26–36. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Applehans BM, Luecken LJ. Attentional processes, anxiety, and the regulation of cortisol reactivity. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal. 2006;19:81–92.

Publication types