[Scoring analysis on prognosis of 63 patients with melodysplastic syndrome]
- PMID: 18426654
[Scoring analysis on prognosis of 63 patients with melodysplastic syndrome]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors in prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) to emphatically study the clinical significance of different scoring systems such as Bournemouth-, Spanish-, Düsseldorf-, Lille, and the International prognostic scoring systems (IPSS), French-American-British (FAB) and World Health Organization (WHO) classifications as well as abnormal clone of chromosome, bone marrow and hematological indicators in evaluating prognosis of MDS patients, and to identify the independent factor related to prognosis. All clinical data of 69 consecutive patients diagnosed as primary MDS over a period of 5 years were collected and stored by Epi Data 3.0, 63 patients out of which were followed up. SPSS 13.0 software was applied to deal with all data. The statistical methods included life table, Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank test and Cox regression. The results indicated that the median age of 63 patients was 38 years. 26 out of 63 patients had karyotype aberration (41.27%). Median OS was 30.63 months, and 33 patients (52.38%) died. All five prognostic scoring systems could successfully discriminate risk groups as regards overall survival. IPSS, Lille and Spanish prognostic scoring system were more effective (p<0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that IPSS (p<0.0001) and Lille chromosome classifications (p<0.0001) were most important factors for OS followed by bone marrow blasts (p=0.00062), Spanish prognostic scoring system (p=0.00064) and Lille prognostic system (p=0.008). The WHO classifications also successfully discriminated between risk groups (p<0.0001). The new WHO subgroups [refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD), with or without ringed sideroblasts] showed a significantly different prognosis (p=0.003) for OS, in comparison to the subgroups having erythroid dysplasia only (RA/RARS) and 5q-syndrome. All patients were reclassified to FAB classification, and the low risk group (RA/RAS) and high risk group (RAEB) also had significant difference (p=0.00012) as regards OS. It is concluded that the major independent prognostic variables for OS are percentage of bone marrow blasts and karyotype aberration. The use of WHO classification have more significance for improving predictive value than that of the FAB classification, and the IPSS can be used for clinical decision-making in patients with cytogenetic results. In the hospitals which cannot carry out the cytogenetic examination, Spanish prognostic system can be applied to the patients without cytogenetic results.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of five prognostic scoring systems, the French-American-British (FAB) and World Health Organization (WHO) classifications in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: Results of a single-center analysis.Ann Hematol. 2006 Aug;85(8):502-13. doi: 10.1007/s00277-005-0030-z. Epub 2006 May 20. Ann Hematol. 2006. PMID: 16715299
-
Classification and scoring systems in myelodysplastic syndromes: a retrospective analysis of 311 patients.Leuk Res. 2006 Aug;30(8):971-7. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.11.015. Epub 2006 Jan 19. Leuk Res. 2006. PMID: 16423393
-
The myelodysplastic syndromes: analysis of prognostic factors and comparison of prognostic systems in 128 Chinese patients from a single institution.Hematol J. 2002;3(3):137-44. doi: 10.1038/sj.thj.6200173. Hematol J. 2002. PMID: 12111649
-
A comparative review of classification systems in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).Semin Oncol. 2005 Aug;32(4 Suppl 5):S3-10. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.06.021. Semin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16085011 Review.
-
Evaluating the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.Ann Hematol. 2002 Sep;81(9):485-97. doi: 10.1007/s00277-002-0530-z. Epub 2002 Sep 24. Ann Hematol. 2002. PMID: 12373348 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous