Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Apr;90(3):247-50.
doi: 10.1308/003588408X261636.

Living-unrelated donor renal transplantation: an alternative to living-related donor transplantation?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Living-unrelated donor renal transplantation: an alternative to living-related donor transplantation?

Nadeem Ahmad et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: An increasing number of living-unrelated, kidney donor transplants are being performed in our unit. We present a comparison of living-unrelated (LURD) and living-related donor (LRD) renal transplant outcomes and analyse influencing factors.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analysed the outcome of all living-donor renal transplants performed at our centre from 1993 to 2004. The parameters studied included patient and graft survival, functioning status of grafts (determined by estimated GFR) at last follow-up and any rejection episodes. Multivariate analysis was performed for recipient and donor age, ethnicity, HLA matching and re-transplants.

Results: A total of 322 live donor kidney transplants (LRD, n = 261; LURD, n = 61) were carried out over this period. Mean recipient age was 28 +/- 16 years in the LRD group and 48 +/- 12 years in LURD, while mean age of the donors was 43 +/- 11 years and 48 +/- 10 years, respectively. Caucasians constituted 80% of all the living donors. Amongst LRD, parents were the commonest (58%) donors followed by siblings (35%). In LURD, 80% were spouses. A total of 33 grafts failed, 30 in LRD (11%) and 3 in LURD (5%). Thirteen patients died, 11 (4.2%) in LRD (7 with functioning graft) and 2 (3.3%) in LURD (1 with functioning graft). Acute rejections occurred in 41% recipients in LRD and 35% in LURD (P = 0.37). Estimated GFR was lower in LURD than in LRD (49 +/- 14 versus 59 +/- 29 ml/min/1.73 m(2); P = 0.032). One- and 3-year patient survival for LRD and LURD was 98.7% and 96.3% and 97.7% and 95%, respectively (P = 0.75). One- and 3-year graft survival was equivalent at 94.8% and 92.3% for LRD, and 98.4% and 93.7% for LURD, respectively (P = 0.18).

Conclusions: Outcome of LRD and LURD is comparable in terms of patient and graft survival, acute rejection rate and estimated GFR despite differences in demographics, HLA matching and re-transplants of recipients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graft survival in LRD and LURD.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient survival in LRD and LURD.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Matas AJ, Payne WD, Sutherland DE, Humar A, Gruessner RW, Kandaswamy R, et al. 2,500 living donor kidney transplants: a single-center experience. Ann Surg. 2001;234:149–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cecka JM. The OPTN/UNOS Renal Transplant Registry. Clin Transpl. 2003:1–12. - PubMed
    1. Rodrigo E, Fernandez-Fresnedo G, Ruiz JC, Pinera C, Heras M, de Francisco AL, et al. Assessment of glomerular filtration rate in transplant recipients with severe renal insufficiency by Nankivell, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Cockroft–Gault equations. Transplant Proc. 2003;35:1671–2. - PubMed
    1. Dagan A, Eisenstein B, Bar-Nathan N, Cleper R, Krause I, Smolkin V, et al. Tubular and glomerular function in children after renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2005;9:440–4. - PubMed
    1. Jacobs SC, Cho E, Dunkin BJ, Flowers JL, Schweitzer E, Cangro C, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience. J Urol. 2000;164:1494–9. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms