Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Sep;23(3):302-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00455-007-9145-9. Epub 2008 Apr 25.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in stroke patients with oral and pharyngeal dysfunction

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in stroke patients with oral and pharyngeal dysfunction

Margareta Bülow et al. Dysphagia. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) technique is a dual-channel electrotherapy system designed specifically for the treatment of pharyngeal dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcome of NMES versus traditional swallowing therapy (TT) in stroke patients. Three European swallowing centers participated in this randomized trial. Twenty-five patients (16 men and 9 women) were included. Twelve patients were randomized for NMES and 13 for TT. Mean age was 70 years for the NMES group and 71 years for the TT group. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients 50-80 years old with cerebrovascular disease (stroke) for more than 3 months before the study, (2) only patients with hemispheric stroke, (3) no brainstem involvement, (4) ability to swallow, and (5) ability to communicate. Pre- and post-trial measurements were videoradiographic swallowing evaluation, nutritional status, oral motor function test, and a visual analog scale (VAS) for self-evaluation of complaints. All subjects received 15 therapy sessions. Statistically significant positive therapy effects for both NMES and TT combined were found, but there was no statistically significant difference in therapy effect between the groups. The correlations between measurements were low. The patient's subjective experience of improvement had low correlation with the outcome from the objective evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dysphagia. 2007 Jan;22(1):11-2 - PubMed
    1. Neuron. 2002 May 30;34(5):831-40 - PubMed
    1. Dysphagia. 2007 Jan;22(1):13-5 - PubMed
    1. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007 Jan;116(1):36-44 - PubMed
    1. Laryngoscope. 2002 Dec;112(12):2204-10 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources