Reduction in mortality and target-lesion revascularisation at 2 years: a comparison between drug-eluting stents and conventional bare-metal stents in the "real world"

Abstract

Background: Long-term safety of drug-eluting stent (DES) is still a concern. We aimed to assess the impact of DES use on all-cause mortality and target-lesion revascularisation (TLR) in routine clinical practice.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation at our institution between January 2003 and December 2004. To account for differences in patient characteristics, logistic regression was used to produce a propensity score for DES group membership. Patients receiving DES were then matched to patients receiving bare metal stents (BMS) with identical propensity scores. These two groups were then compared with respect to the incidence of TLR and all-cause mortality.

Results: During the study period 995 patients received DES. Of these, 82 patients had combined DES and BMS use and were therefore excluded; leaving 913 DES patients compared to 2105 BMS patients. Patients who received DES were more likely to be diabetic, hypertensive, had more lesions treated, restenotic lesions treated, left anterior descending and left main stem interventions, long lesions treated, small diameter lesions treated, and American Heart Association C-type lesions treated. After performing propensity-matching, to account for differences in patient characteristics, we were able to successfully match 777 DES patients to 777 BMS patients. The TLR rates at 24 months were significantly lower for DES patients (DES-4.2% vs BMS-9.2%, p<0.001). All-cause mortality was also significantly lower for DES patients (DES-1.8% vs BMS-4.0%, p=0.01).

Conclusions: In routine clinical practice DES implantation continued to demonstrate a significant reduction in the need for repeat intervention at 24 months. All-cause and cardiac mortality was also significantly lower for DES patients compared to BMS patients.