Predicting technique survival in peritoneal dialysis patients: comparing artificial neural networks and logistic regression
- PMID: 18441002
- PMCID: PMC2517147
- DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfn187
Predicting technique survival in peritoneal dialysis patients: comparing artificial neural networks and logistic regression
Abstract
Background: Early technique failure has been a major limitation on the wider adoption of peritoneal dialysis (PD). The objectives of this study were to use data from a large, multi-centre, prospective database, the United Kingdom Renal Registry (UKRR), in order to determine the ability of an artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict early PD technique failure and to compare its performance with a logistic regression (LR)-based approach.
Methods: The analysis included all incident PD patients enrolled in the UKRR from 1999 to 2004. The event of interest was technique failure. For both the ANN and LR analyses a bootstrap approach was used: the data were divided into 20 random training (75%) and validation (25%) sets. Models were derived on the latter and then used to make predictions on the former. Predictive accuracy was assessed by area under the ROC curve (AUROC). The 20 AUROC values and their standard errors were then averaged.
Results: There were 3269 patients included in the analysis with a mean age of 59.9 years and a mean observation time of 430 days. Of the patients, 38.3% were female and 90.8% were Caucasian. 1458 patients (44.6%) suffered technique failure. The AUROC for the ANN model was 0.760 +/- 0.0167 and the LR model was 0.709 and 0.0208. (P = 0.0164)
Conclusions: Using UKRR data, both ANN and LR models predicted early PD technique failure with moderate accuracy. In this study, an ANN outperformed an LR-based approach. As the scope and the completeness of the UKRR increases, the question of whether more sophisticated ANN models will perform even better remains for further study.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Prediction of premature all-cause mortality in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis using modified artificial neural networks.Aging (Albany NY). 2021 May 13;13(10):14170-14184. doi: 10.18632/aging.203033. Epub 2021 May 13. Aging (Albany NY). 2021. PMID: 33988129 Free PMC article.
-
Determining factors that predict technique survival on peritoneal dialysis: application of regression and artificial neural network methods.Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;118(2):c93-c100. doi: 10.1159/000319988. Epub 2010 Dec 8. Nephron Clin Pract. 2011. PMID: 21150217
-
Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression models for predicting in-hospital mortality after primary liver cancer surgery.PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035781. Epub 2012 Apr 26. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22563399 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression models for prediction of outcomes in trauma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):244-250. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 11. Injury. 2019. PMID: 30660332
-
[Approach to the methodology of classification and regression trees].Gac Sanit. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(1):65-72. doi: 10.1157/13115113. Gac Sanit. 2008. PMID: 18261446 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Mortality predicted accuracy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with hepatic resection using artificial neural network.ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Apr 30;2013:201976. doi: 10.1155/2013/201976. Print 2013. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013. PMID: 23737707 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting mortality in incident dialysis patients: an analysis of the United Kingdom Renal Registry.Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Jun;57(6):894-902. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.12.023. Epub 2011 Apr 12. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011. PMID: 21489668 Free PMC article.
-
An Equation Based on Fuzzy Mathematics to Assess the Timing of Haemodialysis Initiation.Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 10;9(1):5871. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37762-6. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 30971708 Free PMC article.
-
Simultaneous Catheter Replacement for Infectious and Mechanical Complications Without Interruption of Peritoneal Dialysis.Perit Dial Int. 2016 Mar-Apr;36(2):182-7. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00313. Epub 2015 Oct 1. Perit Dial Int. 2016. PMID: 26429420 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence in peritoneal dialysis: general overview.Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):682-687. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2064304. Ren Fail. 2022. PMID: 35469549 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Grassmann A, Gioberge S, Moeller S. ESRD patients in 2004: global overview of patient numbers, treatment modalities and associated trends. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:2587–2593. - PubMed
-
- Sennfalt K, Magnusson M, Carlsson P. Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis—a cost-utility analysis. Perit Dial Int. 2002;22:39–47. - PubMed
-
- Liem YS, Wong JB, Hunink MG, et al. Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis survival in The Netherlands. Kidney Int. 2007;71:153–158. - PubMed
-
- Rubin HR, Fink NE, Plantinga LC, et al. Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis [see comment] JAMA. 2004;291:697–703. - PubMed
-
- Little J, Irwin A, Marshall T, et al. Predicting a patient's choice of dialysis modality: experience in a United Kingdom renal department. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37:981–986. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials