Benefit of adherence with bisphosphonates depends on age and fracture type: results from an analysis of 101,038 new bisphosphonate users
- PMID: 18442318
- PMCID: PMC2574615
- DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.080418
Benefit of adherence with bisphosphonates depends on age and fracture type: results from an analysis of 101,038 new bisphosphonate users
Abstract
The relationship between high adherence to oral bisphosphonates and the risk of different types of fractures has not been well studied among adults of different ages. Using claims data from a large U.S. health care organization, we quantified adherence after initiating bisphosphonate therapy using the medication possession ratio (MPR) and identified fractures. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the rate of fracture among nonadherent persons (MPR < 50%) compared with highly adherent persons (MPR >or= 80%) across several age strata and a variety of types of clinical fractures. In conjunction with fracture incidence rates among the nonadherent, these estimates were used to compute the number needed to treat with high adherence to prevent one fracture, by age and fracture type. Among 101,038 new bisphosphonate users, the proportion of persons with high adherence at 1, 2, and 3 yr was 44%, 39%, and 35%, respectively. Among 65- to 78-yr-old persons with a physician diagnosis of osteoporosis, the crude and adjusted rate of hip fracture among the nonadherent was 1.96 (95% CI, 1.48-2.60) and 1.74 (95% CI, 1.30-2.31), respectively, resulting in a number needed to treat with high adherence to prevent one hip fracture of 107. The impact of high adherence was substantially less for other types of fractures and for younger persons. Analysis of adherence in a non-time-dependent fashion artifactually magnified differences in fracture rates between adherent and nonadherent persons. The antifracture effectiveness associated with high adherence to oral bisphosphonates varied substantially by age and fracture type. These results provide estimates of absolute fracture effectiveness across age subgroups and fracture types that have been minimally evaluated in clinical trials and may be useful for future cost-effectiveness studies.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Estimating bisphosphonate use and fracture reduction among US women aged 45 years and older, 2001-2008.J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Jan;26(1):3-11. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.189. J Bone Miner Res. 2011. PMID: 20662073
-
Risk of hip fracture after bisphosphonate discontinuation: implications for a drug holiday.Osteoporos Int. 2008 Nov;19(11):1613-20. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0604-4. Epub 2008 May 16. Osteoporos Int. 2008. PMID: 18483689 Free PMC article.
-
Adherence to oral bisphosphonates and the risk of subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures among female medicare beneficiaries.Osteoporos Int. 2014 Aug;25(8):2109-16. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2738-x. Epub 2014 May 21. Osteoporos Int. 2014. PMID: 24846316 Free PMC article.
-
Denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab and teriparatide to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(29):1-314. doi: 10.3310/hta24290. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32588816 Free PMC article.
-
Bisphosphonate alternative regimens for the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures: BLAST-OFF, a mixed-methods study.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Apr;28(21):1-169. doi: 10.3310/WYPF0472. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 38634483 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Incidence of fractures of the femur, including subtrochanteric, up to 8 years since initiation of oral bisphosphonate therapy: a register-based cohort study using the US MarketScan claims databases.Osteoporos Int. 2012 Dec;23(12):2873-84. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-1952-7. Epub 2012 Mar 20. Osteoporos Int. 2012. PMID: 22431012
-
Predicting the individualized risk of nonadherence to zoledronic acid among osteoporosis patients receiving the first infusion of zoledronic acid: development and validation of new predictive nomograms.Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 Jul 30;13:20406223221114214. doi: 10.1177/20406223221114214. eCollection 2022. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022. PMID: 35924011 Free PMC article.
-
The association between medication non-adherence and adverse health outcomes in ageing populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;85(11):2464-2478. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14075. Epub 2019 Sep 6. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 31486099 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the prediction of medication compliance: the example of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis.Med Care. 2009 Mar;47(3):334-41. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818afa1c. Med Care. 2009. PMID: 19194337 Free PMC article.
-
The relationship between bisphosphonate adherence and fracture: is it the behavior or the medication? Results from the placebo arm of the fracture intervention trial.J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Apr;26(4):683-8. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.274. J Bone Miner Res. 2011. PMID: 20939064 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Cramer JA, Amonkar MM, Hebborn A, Altman R. Compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate dosing regimens among women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21:1453–1460. - PubMed
-
- Recker RR, Gallagher R, MacCosbe PE. Effect of dosing frequency on bisphosphonate medication adherence in a large longitudinal cohort of women. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:856–861. - PubMed
-
- Curtis JR, Westfall AO, Allison JJ, Freeman A, Saag KG. Channeling and adherence with alendronate and risedronate among chronic glucocorticoid users. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1268–1274. - PubMed
-
- Gold DT, Safi W, Trinh H. Patient preference and adherence: Comparative US studies between two bisphosphonates, weekly risedronate and monthly ibandronate. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22:2383–2391. - PubMed
-
- Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF, Raggio G, Naujoks C. The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:1003–1008. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical