Outcomes of elderly patients aged 80 and over with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis: impact of patient's choice of refusing aortic valve replacement on survival
- PMID: 18443003
- DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcn052
Outcomes of elderly patients aged 80 and over with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis: impact of patient's choice of refusing aortic valve replacement on survival
Abstract
Background: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be performed safely in selected elderly patients with aortic stenosis (AS). However, the survival benefits of AVR over conservative treatment have not been convincingly demonstrated in AS patients aged above 80.
Aim: To investigate the outcomes of patients aged 80 and over with symptomatic, severe AS and by analyzing the effects of patient's choice in either agreeing or refusing to undergo AVR, determine the survival benefits afforded by AVR.
Design: Cohort study.
Methods: Subjects aged 80 and over with severe symptomatic AS, diagnosed between 2001 and 2006 were segregated into three groups: subjects who underwent AVR (Group A); patients who were fit for AVR but declined surgery due to personal choice (Group B) and those who were not fit for surgery and were managed conservatively (Group C). Follow-up was conducted by out-patient attendances, review of medical records and telephone interviews. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.
Results: A total of 103 patients (86.0 +/- 4.2 years, 41% male) were identified and no patient was lost during follow-up. In Group A (n = 17), all 15 patients who underwent AVR were alive after 3.6 +/- 1.4 years follow-up and 2 died whilst awaiting AVR. Seventy-four percent of Group B (n = 24) and 76% of Group C (n = 62) died during follow-up. Group A had significantly better survival than B and C. (P < 0.01) Amongst patients fit for AVR with similar operative risks (Groups A and B), refusal to undergo surgery (hazard ratio 12.61, P = 0.001) was the only predictor of mortality in a multivariate model.
Conclusion: For elderly AS patients fit for surgery, the patient's decision to refuse AVR is associated with a >12-fold increase in mortality risk. These findings have significant implications for informed decision-making when managing the fit, elderly patient with AS.
Similar articles
-
Surgical management of aortic valve disease in the elderly: A retrospective comparative study of valve choice using propensity score analysis.J Heart Valve Dis. 2008 Jul;17(4):355-64; discussion 365. J Heart Valve Dis. 2008. PMID: 18751463
-
Aortic valve replacement and concomitant coronary artery bypass: assessing the impact of multiple grafts.Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Mar;83(3):969-78. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.027. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17307443
-
High-risk patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: management and outcomes.Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Nov;86(5):1450-6; discussion 1456-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.043. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 19049730
-
Is patient-prosthesis mismatch an independent risk factor for early and mid-term overall mortality in adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Sep;9(3):510-8. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.207597. Epub 2009 Jun 4. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19497953 Review.
-
[Surgical strategies for aortic valve disease in elderly patients].Kyobu Geka. 2005 Jul;58(8 Suppl):659-62. Kyobu Geka. 2005. PMID: 16097614 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
ANMCO/SIC/SICI-GISE/SICCH Executive Summary of Consensus Document on Risk Stratification in elderly patients with aortic stenosis before surgery or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Eur Heart J Suppl. 2017 May;19(Suppl D):D354-D369. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/sux012. Epub 2017 May 2. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2017. PMID: 28751850 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical report cards: the myth and the reality.Monash Bioeth Rev. 2009 Sep;28(3):20.1-20. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2009. PMID: 20131525
-
Heart valve disease in elderly Chinese population: effect of advanced age and comorbidities on treatment decision-making and outcomes.J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Jul;13(7):593-601. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.07.010. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27605940 Free PMC article.
-
Ideal Cardiovascular Health and the Prevalence and Severity of Aortic Stenosis in Elderly Patients.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 3;7(3):e007234. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007234. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29431107 Free PMC article.
-
Cell Sources for Tissue Engineering Strategies to Treat Calcific Valve Disease.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Nov 6;5:155. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00155. eCollection 2018. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018. PMID: 30460245 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials