Clinical performance of intrauterine devices in nulligravidae: is the length of the endometrial cavity of significance?
- PMID: 1844327
Clinical performance of intrauterine devices in nulligravidae: is the length of the endometrial cavity of significance?
Abstract
In a double-blind study 236 nulligravidae were randomized to insertion of standard models of two commonly used intrauterine devices, Multiload and Gravigard, or shorter versions of these devices. Before insertion the total axial uterine length and the length of the endometrial cavity were determined. After 12 months the total continuation rate was 57.2%. The clinical performance of Multiload models was not statistically different from that of the Gravigards, and the short IUD-types did not do better than the longer ones. Among the longer models a significant higher continuation rate was observed with the Multiload. The frequency of side effects was not increased when the total uterine cavity length was less than 7 cm. As the incidence of side effects was higher than normally reported after insertion of IUD's in parous women it is concluded that insertion of IUD's in nulligravidae should be performed only when other methods of contraception are unacceptable. The ratio between the lengyh of the uterine cavity and the length of the IUD seems to be of no significance for the clinical events following insertion of IUD's in nulligravidae.
Similar articles
-
Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.Afr J Med Med Sci. 1995 Mar;24(1):59-65. Afr J Med Med Sci. 1995. PMID: 7495202 Clinical Trial.
-
[Use of modified intrauterine device (IUD) TCu 380 with chromium filaments in the immediate postpartum].Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2000 Feb;68:70-6. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2000. PMID: 10774108 Spanish.
-
A critical ('stress') evaluation of the combined ML Copper 250-short IUD in nulliparous women.Contracept Deliv Syst. 1981 Oct;2(4):287-93. Contracept Deliv Syst. 1981. PMID: 12336989
-
[Contraceptive coils and their problems].Duodecim. 1987;103(9):546-51. Duodecim. 1987. PMID: 3331143 Review. Finnish.
-
The intrauterine device in the present and future.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Dec;5(6):829-32. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8286697 Review.
Cited by
-
Uterine dimensions and intrauterine device malposition: can ultrasound predict displacement or expulsion before it happens?Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Nov;302(5):1181-1187. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05713-0. Epub 2020 Aug 3. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020. PMID: 32748051
-
Hormonal and intrauterine methods for contraception for women aged 25 years and younger.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 17;2015(8):CD009805. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009805.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26280888 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of copper intrauterine contraception continuation in young nulliparous women based on intrauterine device type.BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 3;12(10):e060606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060606. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36192095 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials