Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 May;134(3):427-59.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427.

Structural priming: a critical review

Affiliations
Review

Structural priming: a critical review

Martin J Pickering et al. Psychol Bull. 2008 May.

Abstract

Repetition is a central phenomenon of behavior, and researchers have made extensive use of it to illuminate psychological functioning. In the language sciences, a ubiquitous form of such repetition is structural priming, a tendency to repeat or better process a current sentence because of its structural similarity to a previously experienced ("prime") sentence (J. K. Bock, 1986). The recent explosion of research in structural priming has made it the dominant means of investigating the processes involved in the production (and increasingly, comprehension) of complex expressions such as sentences. This review considers its implications for the representation of syntax and the mechanisms of production and comprehension and their relationship. It then addresses the potential functions of structural priming, before turning to its implications for first language acquisition, bilingualism, and aphasia. The authors close with theoretical and empirical recommendations for future investigations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Phrase structure trees for (6a) a simple prepositional-object structure, (6b) a prepositional-object structure with modified object argument, and (6c) a prepositional-object structure in an embedded clause.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Model of structural priming as proposed by Pickering and Branigan (1998), illustrating priming from a prepositional dative sentence with the main verb give. “GIVE” and “SHOW” nodes represent lexical items, and “NP, PP” and “NP, NP” nodes are combinatorial representations. Thickness of the lines represent the degree of activation of the corresponding knowledge. Panel A: Before priming. Panel B: As the prime is produced. Panel C: After the prime is produced.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Altmann GTM, Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition. 1999;73:247–264. - PubMed
    1. Arai M, Van Gompel RPG, Scheepers C. Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology. 2007;54:218–250. - PubMed
    1. Barr DJ. Establishing conventional communication systems: Is common knowledge necessary? Cognitive Science. 2004;28:937–962.
    1. Bates E, MacWhinney B. Functionalist approaches to grammar. In: Wanner E, Gleitman LR, editors. Language acquisition: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. pp. 173–218.
    1. Berndt RS. Sentence production. In: Rapp B, editor. The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind. New York: Psychology Press; 2001. pp. 375–396.

Publication types