Assessment of cardiac output in children: a comparison between the pressure recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiography
- PMID: 18446106
- DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31816c7151
Assessment of cardiac output in children: a comparison between the pressure recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiography
Abstract
Objective: To assess cardiac output in pediatric patients with the pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) and the Doppler echocardiography method. PRAM derives cardiac output from beat-by-beat analysis of the arterial pressure profile (systolic and diastolic phase) in the time domain.
Design: A prospective observational study.
Setting: Pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary care children's hospital.
Patients: Forty-eight patients between the ages of 1 month and 18 yrs.
Interventions: Femoral or radial artery catheterization and mechanical ventilation.
Measurements and main results: Cardiac output was simultaneously estimated by Doppler echocardiography and PRAM. Cardiac output values obtained by Doppler echocardiography (2.7 +/- 1.6 L/min, range 0.92-8.20) were significantly correlated with those estimated by PRAM (2.6 +/- 1.7 L/min, range 0.89-7.48; r2 = .99, p < .01). The mean difference between the two estimates was 0.12 +/- 0.27 L x min(-1) (95% confidence interval, -0.54 to 0.77 L x min(-1)).
Conclusions: In the range of ages evaluated, PRAM provides reliable estimates of cardiac output when compared with noninvasive techniques.
Comment in
-
Cardiac output measurement in children: what is lacking?Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 May;9(3):333-4. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318172eb8c. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008. PMID: 18446096 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous