Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep;17(9):1201-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0665-2. Epub 2008 Apr 30.

The international spine registry SPINE TANGO: status quo and first results

Affiliations

The international spine registry SPINE TANGO: status quo and first results

Markus Melloh et al. Eur Spine J. 2008 Sep.

Erratum in

  • Eur Spine J. 2008 Sep;17(9):1210

Abstract

With an official life time of over 5 years, Spine Tango can meanwhile be considered the first international spine registry. In this paper we present an overview of frequency statistics of Spine Tango for demonstrating the genesis of questionnaire development and the constantly increasing activity in the registry. Results from two exemplar studies serve for showing concepts of data analysis applied to a spine registry. Between 2002 and 2006, about 6,000 datasets were submitted by 25 centres. Descriptive analyses were performed for demographic, surgical and follow-up data of three generations of the Spine Tango surgery and follow-up forms. The two exemplar studies used multiple linear regression models to identify potential predictor variables for the occurrence of dura lesions in posterior spinal fusion, and to evaluate which covariates influenced the length of hospital stay. Over the study period there was a rise in median patient age from 52.3 to 58.6 years in the Spine Tango data pool and an increasing percentage of degenerative diseases as main pathology from 59.9 to 71.4%. Posterior decompression was the most frequent surgical measure. About one-third of all patients had documented follow-ups. The complication rate remained below 10%. The exemplar studies identified "centre of intervention" and "number of segments of fusion" as predictors of the occurrence of dura lesions in posterior spinal fusion surgery. Length of hospital stay among patients with posterior fusion was significantly influenced by "centre of intervention", "surgeon credentials", "number of segments of fusion", "age group" and "sex". Data analysis from Spine Tango is possible but complicated by the incompatibility of questionnaire generations 1 and 2 with the more recent generation 3. Although descriptive and also analytic studies at evidence level 2++ can be performed, findings cannot yet be generalised to any specific country or patient population. Current limitations of Spine Tango include the low number and short duration of follow-ups and the lack of sufficiently detailed patient data on subgroup levels. Although the number of participants is steadily growing, no country is yet represented with a sufficient number of hospitals. Nevertheless, the benefits of the project for the whole spine community become increasingly visible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Concept of Spine Tango module as filter between user and central database
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Frequency of main pathology in Spine Tango generations 1, 2 and 3 in percent
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Frequency of type of complications at follow-up in Spine Tango generations 1, 2 and 3 in percent
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Occurrence of dura lesions in posterior spinal fusion by number of segments of fusion
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Length of hospital stay in posterior spinal fusion in seven selected clinics

References

    1. Aebi M, Grob D (2004) SSE Spine Tango: a European Spine Registry promoted by the Spine Society of Europe (SSE). Eur Spine J 13:661–662. Epub 2004 Dec 22 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Audige L, Hanson B, Kopjar B (2006) Issues in the planning and conduct of non-randomised studies. Injury 37:340–348. Epub 2006 Feb 17 - PubMed
    1. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Korff M, Waddell G. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine. 1998;23:2003–2013. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fernandez-Fairen M, Sala P, Ramirez H, Gil J. A prospective randomized study of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2007;32:395–401. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255023.56466.44. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine. 2002;27:1131–1141. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00002. - DOI - PubMed