Investigating factors related to the effects of time-out on stuttering in adults
- PMID: 18446575
- DOI: 10.1080/13682820701449893
Investigating factors related to the effects of time-out on stuttering in adults
Abstract
Background: Response-contingent time-out has been shown to be an effective technique for enhancing fluency in people who stutter. However, the factors that determine individual responsiveness to time-out are not well understood.
Aims: The study investigated the effectiveness of using response-contingent time-out to reduce stuttering frequency in adults who stutter. In addition, it investigated the predictive value of participants' stutter severity, age, previous treatment history, and type of stutter on the responsiveness to time-out conditioning.
Methods & procedures: Sixty people who stutter participated in the study. Half were exposed to time-out following each moment of stuttering over a 40-min period, the remaining participants acted as controls.
Outcomes & results: Results showed that individuals who stutter are highly responsive to time-out, and that the participants with a more severe stutter responded better than those with a mild stutter. To a lesser degree, previous treatment and speech rate also influenced treatment success. Age and type of stutter did not, although the proportion of repetition types of stutters increased over the experiment conditions, with prolongations and blocks decreasing, for the treatment group.
Conclusions: This simple operant conditioning treatment method is effective in reducing stuttering. Individuals respond to time-out regardless of their age, type of stutter, stuttering severity or treatment history, thus it is a treatment methodology potentially suitable for all clients. This study investigated initial responsiveness to time-out; therefore, further research is necessary to determine the durability of fluency over time.
Similar articles
-
A phase II clinical trial of self-imposed time-out treatment for stuttering in adults and adolescents.Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Jan 15;28(1):33-42. doi: 10.1080/09638280500165245. Disabil Rehabil. 2006. PMID: 16393831 Clinical Trial.
-
The relationship between mental health disorders and treatment outcomes among adults who stutter.J Fluency Disord. 2009 Mar;34(1):29-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Mar 5. J Fluency Disord. 2009. PMID: 19500713
-
Effect of delayed auditory feedback on stuttering-like disfluencies.Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Mar-Apr;60(2):e70007. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70007. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025. PMID: 39977721
-
Integrating functional measures with treatment: a tactic for enhancing personally significant change in the treatment of adults and adolescents who stutter.Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Aug;21(3):264-77. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0068). Epub 2012 Apr 4. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012. PMID: 22493023 Review.
-
Stuttering treatment for adults: an update on contemporary approaches.Semin Speech Lang. 2010 Nov;31(4):272-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1265760. Epub 2010 Nov 15. Semin Speech Lang. 2010. PMID: 21080299 Review.
Cited by
-
Management options for pediatric patients who stutter: current challenges and future directions.Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2016 Jul 7;7:71-77. doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S77568. eCollection 2016. Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2016. PMID: 29388582 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The state of the art in non-pharmacological interventions for developmental stuttering. Part 1: a systematic review of effectiveness.Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015 Sep-Oct;50(5):676-718. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12171. Epub 2015 Jun 30. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015. PMID: 26123259 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical