Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Apr 30:8:94.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-94.

Methods of data collection and analysis for the economic evaluation alongside a national, multi-centre trial in the UK: conventional ventilation or ECMO for Severe Adult Respiratory Failure (CESAR)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Methods of data collection and analysis for the economic evaluation alongside a national, multi-centre trial in the UK: conventional ventilation or ECMO for Severe Adult Respiratory Failure (CESAR)

Mariamma M Thalanany et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is a technology used in treatment of patients with severe but potentially reversible respiratory failure. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial (CESAR) was funded in the UK to compare care including ECMO with conventional intensive care management. The protocol and funding for the CESAR trial included plans for economic data collection and analysis. Given the high cost of treatment, ECMO is considered an expensive technology for many funding systems. However, conventional treatment for severe respiratory failure is also one of the more costly forms of care in any health system.

Methods/design: The objectives of the economic evaluation are to compare the costs of a policy of referral for ECMO with those of conventional treatment; to assess cost-effectiveness and the cost-utility at 6 months follow-up; and to assess the cost-utility over a predicted lifetime. Resources used by patients in the trial are identified. Resource use data are collected from clinical report forms and through follow up interviews with patients. Unit costs of hospital intensive care resources are based on parallel research on cost functions in UK NHS intensive care units. Other unit costs are based on published NHS tariffs. Cost effectiveness analysis uses the outcome: survival without severe disability. Cost utility analysis is based on quality adjusted life years gained based on the Euroqol EQ-5D at 6 months. Sensitivity analysis is planned to vary assumptions about transport costs and method of costing intensive care. Uncertainty will also be expressed in analysis of individual patient data. Probabilities of cost effectiveness given different funding thresholds will be estimated.

Discussion: In our view it is important to record our methods in detail and present them before publication of the results of the trial so that a record of detail not normally found in the final trial reports can be made available in the public domain.

Trial registrations: The CESAR trial registration number is ISRCTN47279827.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Unit cost flowchart for hospital critical care.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lewandowski K. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory failure. Critical Care. 2000;4:156–168. doi: 10.1186/cc689. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hemmila MR, Rowe SA, Boules TN, Miskulin J, McGillicuddy JW, Schuerer DJ, Haft JW, Swaniker F, Arbabi S, Hirschl RB, Bartlett RH. Extracorporeal life support for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Adults. Annals of Surgery. 2004;240:595–607. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hill JD, O'Brien TG, Murray JJ, Dontigny L, Bramson ML, Osborn JJ, Gerbode F. Prolonged extracorporeal oxygenation for acute post-traumatic respiratory failure (shock-lung syndrome) N Eng J Med. 1972;286:629–634. - PubMed
    1. UK Collaborative Trial Group UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Lancet. 1996;348:75–82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66228-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartlett RH. Extracorporeal Life Support Registry Report 1995. ASAIO J. 1997;43:104–7. doi: 10.1097/00002480-199701000-00018. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources