Evaluation of three polymerase chain reaction techniques for detection of Brucella DNA in peripheral human blood
- PMID: 18449219
- DOI: 10.1139/w08-017
Evaluation of three polymerase chain reaction techniques for detection of Brucella DNA in peripheral human blood
Abstract
Brucellosis is a widespread zoonosis. Currently the diagnosis of this zoonosis is based on microbiological and serological laboratory tests. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been used to detect DNA from Brucella. Different target genes, primer pairs, PCR techniques, and extraction procedures have previously been published for Brucella detection. But only a few of these primers have been used in human samples, and only one study has been carried out to compare sensitivity between them. In the present study, 3 sets of primers and 3 different PCR protocols amplifying 3 different regions of the Brucella genome were compared for detection of Brucella DNA in a peripheral-blood PCR assay to conclude which is most suitable for the clinical diagnostic laboratory. These 3 pairs of primers amplify 3 different fragments included in (i) a gene encoding a 31 kDa Brucella abortus antigen (B4/B5), (ii) a sequence 16S rRNA of B. abortus (F4/R2), and (iii) a gene encoding an outer membrane protein (omp-2) (JPF/JPR). Some modifications on the reported techniques were applied during the present work to improve the outcome. The results showed that the B4/B5 primer pair had the highest sensitivity for detection of positive samples (98%), the JPF/JPR primer pair detected 88.4% of positive samples, whereas F4/R2 primer pair was the least sensitive, being able to detect only 53.1% of positive samples. The specificity of the 3 techniques was 100%. The B4/B5 primer pair was also able to detect the smallest number of bacteria (700 cfu/mL), whereas JPF/JPR was able to detect 7 x 105 cfu/mL and F4/R2 was able to detect 7 x 107 cfu/mL. It is thus concluded that using the B4/B5 primer PCR with the suggested modifications is a robust assay, which meets the sensitivity requirements to be used for testing of human blood samples for brucellosis in the diagnostic laboratory.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of three different PCR methods for detection of Brucella spp in human blood samples.FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2002 Oct 11;34(2):147-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2002.tb00616.x. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2002. PMID: 12381466
-
Evaluation of different primers for detection of Brucella in human and animal serum samples by using PCR method.Arch Iran Med. 2015 Jan;18(1):44-50. Arch Iran Med. 2015. PMID: 25556386
-
Diagnosis of human brucellosis in Egypt by polymerase chain reaction.East Mediterr Health J. 2009 Sep-Oct;15(5):1068-74. East Mediterr Health J. 2009. PMID: 20214119
-
The detection of Brucella spp. using PCR-ELISA and real-time PCR assays.Clin Lab. 2004;50(7-8):387-94. Clin Lab. 2004. PMID: 15330505 Review.
-
Laboratory-based diagnosis of brucellosis--a review of the literature. Part I: Techniques for direct detection and identification of Brucella spp.Clin Lab. 2003;49(9-10):487-505. Clin Lab. 2003. PMID: 14572205 Review.
Cited by
-
Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 Nov 13;33(1):e00073-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00073-19. Print 2019 Dec 18. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019. PMID: 31722888 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A protein-conjugate approach to develop a monoclonal antibody-based antigen detection test for the diagnosis of human brucellosis.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Jun 5;8(6):e2926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002926. eCollection 2014 Jun. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014. PMID: 24901521 Free PMC article.
-
Brucellosis: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment-a comprehensive review.Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2295398. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2295398. Epub 2024 Jan 2. Ann Med. 2023. PMID: 38165919 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Microbiological Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis: An Overview.Pathogens. 2021 Dec 14;10(12):1623. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10121623. Pathogens. 2021. PMID: 34959578 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Brucellosis in the Brazilian Pantanal wetland: threat to animal production and wildlife conservation.Braz J Microbiol. 2022 Dec;53(4):2287-2297. doi: 10.1007/s42770-022-00831-0. Epub 2022 Oct 21. Braz J Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 36269553 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical