Who are the new users of antipsychotic medications?
- PMID: 18451006
- PMCID: PMC2739805
- DOI: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.5.507
Who are the new users of antipsychotic medications?
Abstract
Objective: This study examined changes in the prevalence of antipsychotic medication use and the characteristics of antipsychotic users in the U.S. population between 1996 and 2005.
Methods: Data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey from 1996-1997 and 2004-2005 were used to examine the rate of first- and second-generation antipsychotic medication use and changes in the characteristics of users of all ages. Trends were examined in the level of use by antipsychotic users, both in terms of defined daily dose units and number of prescriptions.
Results: The rate of antipsychotic use has increased substantially between 1996-1997 and 2004-2005, but the average dose measured both by defined daily dose units and number of prescriptions has remained constant. The rapid diffusion of antipsychotic medications did not occur among individuals with schizophrenia, but rather it included substantial growth among those with newer on-label conditions (such as bipolar disorder) and a high, constant rate of off-label use. Demographic, financial, and insurance characteristics of users have remained fairly constant, with few exceptions. The average age of antipsychotic users declined during the study period, because more children were using these medications in 2004-2005. However, the gender, racial, ethnic, and insurance composition of users has been fairly stable over time.
Conclusions: The rapid diffusion of second-generation antipsychotic medications was achieved by large increases in the rate of use in certain subpopulations, most notably youths. Increasing understanding about the marginal efficacy and side-effect risks of newer and more expensive antipsychotic agents, even when prescribed as indicated, suggests that the dramatic increase in use warrants careful attention.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Utilization and costs of antipsychotic agents: a Canadian population-based study, 1996-2006.Psychiatr Serv. 2008 May;59(5):547-53. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.5.547. Psychiatr Serv. 2008. PMID: 18451015
-
Spillover effects of state medicaid antipsychotic prior authorization policies in US commercially insured youth.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):1064-1071. doi: 10.1002/pds.5032. Epub 2020 Jun 18. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020. PMID: 32558177
-
Changes in drug coverage generosity and untreated serious mental illness: transitioning from Medicaid to Medicare Part D.JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;72(2):179-88. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1259. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 25588123 Free PMC article.
-
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of schizophrenic patient care settings: impact of an atypical antipsychotic under long-acting injection formulation].Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):235-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82390-5. Encephale. 2005. PMID: 15959450 Review. French.
-
[Antipsychotics in bipolar disorders].Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):417-24. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95456-5. Encephale. 2004. PMID: 15627046 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Ten-year trends in quality of care and spending for depression: 1996 through 2005.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;68(12):1218-26. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.146. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011. PMID: 22147841 Free PMC article.
-
Review of the operational definition for first-episode psychosis.Early Interv Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;3(4):259-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2009.00148.x. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2009. PMID: 22642728 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does comparative effectiveness have a comparative edge?JAMA. 2009 Jun 17;301(23):2488-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.851. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19531789 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Impacts of Psychopharmaceuticals on the Neurodevelopment of Aquatic Wildlife: A Call for Increased Knowledge Exchange across Disciplines to Highlight Implications for Human Health.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 12;18(10):5094. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105094. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34065793 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring disparities across the distribution of mental health care expenditures.J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2013 Mar;16(1):3-12. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2013. PMID: 23676411 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rosenheck R, Leslie D, Sindelar J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics and perphenazine in a randomized trial of treatment for chronic schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2006;163(12):2080–2089. - PubMed
-
- Duggan M. Do new prescription drugs pay for themselves? The case of second-generation anti-psychotics. Journal of Health Economics. 2005;24:1–31. - PubMed
-
- Domino M, Frank R, Rosenheck R. The diffusion of new antipsychotic medications and formulary policy. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2003;29(1):95–104. - PubMed
-
- Freedman R. The Choice of Antipsychotic Drugs for Schizophrenia. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;353(12):1286–1288. - PubMed
-
- Olfson M, Blanco C, Liu L, Moreno C, Laje G. National Trends in the Outpatient Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Antipsychotic Drugs. Archives of General Psychiatry. 63(6):679–685. - PubMed