Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr 30;49(2):255-64.
doi: 10.3349/ymj.2008.49.2.255.

Agreements between indirect calorimetry and prediction equations of resting energy expenditure in end-stage renal disease patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Affiliations

Agreements between indirect calorimetry and prediction equations of resting energy expenditure in end-stage renal disease patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Seoung Woo Lee et al. Yonsei Med J. .

Abstract

Purpose: Equations are frequently used to estimate resting energy expenditure (REE) in a clinical setting. However, few studies have examined their accuracy in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients.

Patients and methods: To investigate agreement between indirect calorimetry and several REE estimating equations in 38 ESRD patients on peritoneal dialysis, we performed indirect calorimetry and compared the results with REEs estimated using 5 equations [Harris-Benedict (HBE), Mifflin, WHO, Schofield, and Cunningham].

Results: Measured REE was 1393.2+/-238.7 kcal/day. There were no significant differences between measured and estimated REEs except Mifflin (1264.9+/-224.8 kcal/day). Root mean square errors were smallest for HBE, followed by Schofield, Cunningham, and WHO, and largest for Mifflin (171.3, 171.9, 174.6, 175.3, and 224.6, respectively). In Bland-Altman plot, correlation coefficients between mean values and differences were significant for HBE (r=0.412, p=0.012) and tended to be significant for Cunningham (r=0.283, p=0.086). In DM patients and patients with overhydration, HBE showed significant underestimation when REE increased.

Conclusion: In ESRD patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), REE-estimating equations have no significant differences from indirect calorimetry, except Mifflin. However, HBE showed greater bias than others when REE was high.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bland-Altman plot between the mean values of measured and estimated REE and difference between measured and estimated REE using (A) HBE, (B) WHO, (C) Schofield, (D) Mifflin, and (E) Cunningham equations in all study subjects (n = 38). The 3 horizontal lines represent + 2SD, mean, and - 2SD of the differences between measured and estimated REE values. HBE, REE by Harris Benedict equation; Mifflin, REE by Mifflin equation; WHO, REE by WHO equation; Schofield, REE by Schofield equation; Cunningham, REE by Cunningham equation.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Correlation between measured REE and HBE in total patients, normohydrated patients (open circle) and overhydrated patients (closed circle).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Qureshi AR, Alvestrand A, Danielsson A, Divino-Filho JC, Gutierrez A, Lindholm B, et al. Factors predicting malnutrition in hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional study. Kidney Int. 1998;53:773–782. - PubMed
    1. Widdowson EM, Edholm OG, McCance RA. The food intake and energy expenditure of cadets in training. Br J Nutr. 1954;8:147–155. - PubMed
    1. Boothby WM, Sandiford I. Summary of the basal metabolism data on 8614 subjects with special reference to the normal standards for the estimation of the basal metabolic rate. J Biol Chem. 1922;54:783–803.
    1. Ravussin E, Lillioja S, Knowler WC, Christin L, Freymond D, Abbott WG, et al. Reduced rate of energy expenditure as a risk factor for body weight gain. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:467–472. - PubMed
    1. Elia M. Energy expenditure in whole body. In: Kinney JM, Tucker HN, editors. Energy metabolism: Tissue determinants and cellular corollaries. New York: Raven Press; 1992. pp. 19–59.