Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 May 1:8:15.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-15.

Inadequate prenatal care and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a comparison of indices

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Inadequate prenatal care and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a comparison of indices

Maureen I Heaman et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: The objectives of this study were to determine rates of prenatal care utilization in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada from 1991 to 2000; to compare two indices of prenatal care utilization in identifying the proportion of the population receiving inadequate prenatal care; to determine the association between inadequate prenatal care and adverse pregnancy outcomes (preterm birth, low birth weight [LBW], and small-for-gestational age [SGA]), using each of the indices; and, to assess whether or not, and to what extent, gestational age modifies this association.

Methods: We conducted a population-based study of women having a hospital-based singleton live birth from 1991 to 2000 (N = 80,989). Data sources consisted of a linked mother-baby database and a physician claims file maintained by Manitoba Health. Rates of inadequate prenatal care were calculated using two indices, the R-GINDEX and the APNCU. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between inadequate prenatal care and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Stratified analysis was then used to determine whether the association between inadequate prenatal care and LBW or SGA differed by gestational age.

Results: Rates of inadequate/no prenatal care ranged from 8.3% using APNCU to 8.9% using R-GINDEX. The association between inadequate prenatal care and preterm birth and LBW varied depending on the index used, with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) ranging from 1.0 to 1.3. In contrast, both indices revealed the same strength of association of inadequate prenatal care with SGA (AOR 1.4). Both indices demonstrated heterogeneity (non-uniformity) across gestational age strata, indicating the presence of effect modification by gestational age.

Conclusion: Selection of a prenatal care utilization index requires careful consideration of its methodological underpinnings and limitations. The two indices compared in this study revealed different patterns of utilization of prenatal care, and should not be used interchangeably. Use of these indices to study the association between utilization of prenatal care and pregnancy outcomes affected by the duration of pregnancy should be approached cautiously.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. US Department of Health and Human Services Healthy People 2010. Maternal, Infant, and Child Health. Chapter 16. Vol. II, 2nd ed. 2000. http://www.healthypeople.gov/document/html/volume2/16mich.htm
    1. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada . SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Healthy Beginnings: Guidelines for care during pregnancy and childbirth. Vol. 71. Ottawa, SOGC; 1998.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 3rd. Elk Grove Village, IL, Author; 1992. pp. 1–279.
    1. Kogan MD, Martin JA, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M, Ventura SJ, Frigoletto FD. The changing pattern of prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981-1995, using different prenatal care indices. Jama. 1998;279:1623–1628. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.20.1623. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kessner D, Singer D, Kalk C, Schlesinger E. Infant death: An analysis by maternal risk and health care. In: Kessner D, editor. Contrasts in Health Status. Washington, D.C., Institute of Medicine; 1973.

Publication types