Statistical issues in the evaluation of screening and early detection modalities
- PMID: 18452826
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2006.11.008
Statistical issues in the evaluation of screening and early detection modalities
Abstract
Thorough evaluation of a screening test requires conducting a series of studies to ascertain its ability to detect accurately disease, as well as its benefits and costs. In this article, I review the steps involved in evaluating a screening test, using the case of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer as a case study. I discuss designs for quantifying the diagnostic properties of a screening test and compare several different studies that have produced quite different estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of PSA screening. I also review methods that may be used to combine other markers or tests with PSA to improve test accuracy. Determining the benefits of a screening test is complex, particularly when information from randomized trials is lacking. I review several observational studies of PSA benefit and discuss the use of computer models for inferring the impact of screening from trends in population mortality.
Similar articles
-
Is prostate-specific antigen velocity useful in early detection of prostate cancer? A critical appraisal of the evidence.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Oct 17;99(20):1510-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm171. Epub 2007 Oct 9. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007. PMID: 17925534
-
PSA-based screening for prostate cancer: how does it compare with other cancer screening tests?Eur Urol. 2008 Aug;54(2):262-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.05.032. Epub 2008 May 27. Eur Urol. 2008. PMID: 18556114 Review.
-
[Results and participation factors to the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) with Prostate Specific Antigen: French departments of Tarn and Hérault].Prog Urol. 2009 Jul;19(7):487-98. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2009.03.001. Epub 2009 Apr 28. Prog Urol. 2009. PMID: 19559380 Clinical Trial. French.
-
Estimating the cumulative risk of a false-positive under a regimen involving various types of cancer screening tests.J Med Screen. 2008;15(1):18-22. doi: 10.1258/jms.2008.007076. J Med Screen. 2008. PMID: 18416950
-
Breast cancer screening and biomarkers.Methods Mol Biol. 2009;472:307-21. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-492-0_13. Methods Mol Biol. 2009. PMID: 19107439 Review.
Cited by
-
The role of combined measurement of tissue mRNA levels of AMACR and survivin in the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected prostate cancer.Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Dec;44(6):1681-9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-012-0220-2. Epub 2012 Jun 21. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012. PMID: 22718029
-
Pseudomonas aeruginosa serology and risk for re-isolation in the EPIC trial.J Cyst Fibros. 2013 Mar;12(2):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 1. J Cyst Fibros. 2013. PMID: 22944725 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
α-Methylacyl-CoA racemase spliced variants and their expression in normal and malignant prostate tissues.Urology. 2011 Jan;77(1):249.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.005. Urology. 2011. PMID: 21195844 Free PMC article.
-
New Prognostic Markers: The Pathway from Research to Clinical Practice.Grand rounds Urol. 2009 Aug;8(3):7-13. Grand rounds Urol. 2009. PMID: 24834438 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A duplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay based on quantification of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase transcripts and prostate cancer antigen 3 in urine sediments improved diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer.J Urol. 2009 Jun;181(6):2508-13; discussion 2513-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.110. Epub 2009 Apr 16. J Urol. 2009. PMID: 19371911 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous