Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 May;121(5):1821-1829.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816b1350.

Outcome analysis of combined lipoabdominoplasty versus conventional abdominoplasty

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Outcome analysis of combined lipoabdominoplasty versus conventional abdominoplasty

Justin B Heller et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 May.

Abstract

Background: Abdominoplasty and liposuction have traditionally been separate procedures. The authors performed a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the outcomes of a novel single-stage approach combining extensive lipoplasty with a modified transverse abdominoplasty.

Methods: One hundred fourteen patients were evaluated for abdominal contouring. Patients were categorized into four groups: group I (n = 20) received abdominal liposuction only, group II (n = 33) traditional W-pattern incision line abdominoplasty, group III (n = 30) modified transverse incision abdominoplasty, and group IV (n = 31) combined procedure involving widely distributed abdominal liposuction accompanied by inverted V-pattern dissection abdominoplasty. Wound complications, patient satisfaction, and revision rates were compared statistically.

Results: Group I (liposuction alone) experienced an overall complication rate of 5 percent; two patients were dissatisfied (10 percent) and underwent further revision with full abdominoplasties. Group II (traditional W-pattern abdominoplasty) had a complication rate of 42 percent, a dissatisfaction rate of 42 percent, and a revision rate of 39 percent. By comparison, group III (modified low transverse abdominoplasty) had a complication rate of 17 percent, a dissatisfaction rate of 37 percent, and a revision rate of 33 percent. Group IV (combined liposuction plus abdominoplasty) had significantly lower complication, dissatisfaction, and revision rates (9, 3, and 3 percent, respectively).

Conclusions: Modified transverse abdominoplasty combined with extensive liposuction and limited paramedian supraumbilical dissection produced fewer complications and less dissatisfaction than did traditional abdominoplasty. This may be attributable to a reduced tension midline closure in the suprapubic region, less lateral undermining in the upper abdomen, and greater preservation of intercostal artery blood flow to the flap.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kelly, H. A report of gynecologic diseases (excessive growth of fat). Johns Hopkins Med. J. 10: 197, 1899.
    1. Pitanguy, I. Abdominal lipectomy: An approach to it through analysis of 300 consecutive cases. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 40: 384, 1967.
    1. Hensel, J. M., Lehman, J. A., Jr., Tantri, M. P., et al. An outcome analysis and satisfaction survey of 199 consecutive abdominoplasties. Ann. Plast. Surg. 46: 357, 2001.
    1. Huger, W. E. The anatomic rationale for abdominal lipectomy. Ann. Surg. 45: 612, 1979.
    1. Wilkinson, T. S., and Swartz, B. E. Individual modifications in body contour surgery: The “limited” abdominoplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 77: 779, 1986.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources