Three-dimensional cell culture matrices: state of the art
- PMID: 18454635
- DOI: 10.1089/teb.2007.0150
Three-dimensional cell culture matrices: state of the art
Abstract
Traditional methods of cell growth and manipulation on 2-dimensional (2D) surfaces have been shown to be insufficient for new challenges of cell biology and biochemistry, as well as in pharmaceutical assays. Advances in materials chemistry, materials fabrication and processing technologies, and developmental biology have led to the design of 3D cell culture matrices that better represent the geometry, chemistry, and signaling environment of natural extracellular matrix. In this review, we present the status of state-of-the-art 3D cell-growth techniques and scaffolds and analyze them from the perspective of materials properties, manufacturing, and functionality. Particular emphasis was placed on tissue engineering and in vitro modeling of human organs, where we see exceptionally strong potential for 3D scaffolds and cell-growth methods. We also outline key challenges in this field and most likely directions for future development of 3D cell culture over the period of 5-10 years.
Similar articles
-
Micro-engineered 3D scaffolds for cell culture studies.Macromol Biosci. 2012 Oct;12(10):1301-14. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201200132. Epub 2012 Sep 10. Macromol Biosci. 2012. PMID: 22965790 Review.
-
Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems.Trends Biotechnol. 2004 Jul;22(7):354-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.05.005. Trends Biotechnol. 2004. PMID: 15245908 Review.
-
Bioactive composite materials for tissue engineering scaffolds.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005 May;2(3):303-17. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2.3.303. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005. PMID: 16288594 Review.
-
Cell culture in autologous fibrin scaffolds for applications in tissue engineering.Exp Cell Res. 2014 Mar 10;322(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.12.017. Epub 2013 Dec 28. Exp Cell Res. 2014. PMID: 24378385 Review.
-
The potential for the use of nanofeaturing in medical devices.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005 May;2(3):293-301. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2.3.293. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005. PMID: 16288593 Review.
Cited by
-
Targeting Matrix Metalloproteinases: A Potential Strategy for Improving Cell Transplantation for Nervous System Repair.Cell Transplant. 2021 Jan-Dec;30:9636897211012909. doi: 10.1177/09636897211012909. Cell Transplant. 2021. PMID: 33975447 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Progress on Biodegradable Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Prepared by Thermally-Induced Phase Separation (TIPS).Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 28;22(7):3504. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073504. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID: 33800709 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A tissue-engineered subcutaneous pancreatic cancer model for antitumor drug evaluation.Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:1167-76. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S42464. Epub 2013 Mar 19. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013. PMID: 23658483 Free PMC article.
-
Structural and molecular micropatterning of dual hydrogel constructs for neural growth models using photochemical strategies.Biomed Microdevices. 2013 Feb;15(1):49-61. doi: 10.1007/s10544-012-9687-y. Biomed Microdevices. 2013. PMID: 22903647 Free PMC article.
-
Biopolymer Honeycomb Microstructures: A Review.Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;16(2):772. doi: 10.3390/ma16020772. Materials (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36676507 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources