Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 May 5:9:65.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-65.

Motor control or graded activity exercises for chronic low back pain? A randomised controlled trial

Luciana G Macedo  1 , Jane Latimer, Chris G Maher, Paul W Hodges, Michael Nicholas, Lois Tonkin, James H McAuley, Ryan Stafford
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Motor control or graded activity exercises for chronic low back pain? A randomised controlled trial

Luciana G Macedo et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Chronic low back pain remains a major health problem in Australia and around the world. Unfortunately the majority of treatments for this condition produce small effects because not all patients respond to each treatment. It appears that only 25-50% of patients respond to exercise. The two most popular types of exercise for low back pain are graded activity and motor control exercises. At present however, there are no guidelines to help clinicians select the best treatment for a patient. As a result, time and money are wasted on treatments which ultimately fail to help the patient.

Methods: This paper describes the protocol of a randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of motor control exercises with a graded activity program in the treatment of chronic non specific low back pain. Further analysis will identify clinical features that may predict a patient's response to each treatment. One hundred and seventy two participants will be randomly allocated to receive either a program of motor control exercises or graded activity. Measures of outcome will be obtained at 2, 6 and 12 months after randomisation. The primary outcomes are: pain (average pain intensity over the last week) and function (patient-specific functional scale) at 2 and 6 months. Potential treatment effect modifiers will be measured at baseline.

Discussion: This trial will not only evaluate which exercise approach is more effective in general for patients will chronic low back pain, but will also determine which exercise approach is best for an individual patient.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12607000432415.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bogduk N. Management of chronic low back pain. MJA. 2004;180:79–83. - PubMed
    1. Waddell G. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain . Spine. 1987;12:632–644. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198709000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hicks GE, Fritz JM, Delitto A, S.M. MG. Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2005;86:1753–1762. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kasai R. Current trends in exercise management for chronic low back pain: comparison between strengthening exercise and spinal segmental stabilization exercise. J Phys Med Sci. 2006;18:97–105.
    1. Freburger JK, Carey TS, Holmes GM. Effectiveness of physical therapy for the management of chronic spine disorders: a propensity score approach . Phys Ther. 2006;86:381–394. - PubMed

Publication types