Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May;36(4):276-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.07.008.

Surgical mask filter and fit performance

Tara Oberg  1 , Lisa M Brosseau
Affiliations

Surgical mask filter and fit performance

Tara Oberg et al. Am J Infect Control. 2008 May.

Abstract

Background: Surgical masks have been used since the early 1900s to minimize infection of surgical wounds from wearer-generated bacteria. There is ongoing debate, however, whether surgical masks can meet the expectations of respiratory protection devices. The goal of this study was to evaluate the filter performance and facial fit of a sample of surgical masks.

Methods: Filter penetration was measured for at least 3 replicates of 9 surgical masks using monodisperse latex sphere aerosols (0.895, 2.0, and 3.1 microm) at 6 L/min and 0.075-microm sodium chloride particles at 84 L/min. Facial fit was measured on 20 subjects for the 5 masks with lowest particle penetration, using both qualitative and quantitative fit tests.

Results: Masks typically used in dental settings collected particles with significantly lower efficiency than those typically used in hospital settings. All subjects failed the unassisted qualitative fit test on the first exercise (normal breathing). Eighteen subjects failed the assisted qualitative fit tests; 60% failed on the first exercise. Quantitative fit factors ranged from 2.5 to 9.6.

Conclusion: None of these surgical masks exhibited adequate filter performance and facial fit characteristics to be considered respiratory protection devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Penetration (%) of latex spheres. (A) Dental Masks (A-C). (B) Hospital masks (D-I).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • The standard for the surgical mask.
    Belkin NL. Belkin NL. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Apr;37(3):258-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.07.010. Am J Infect Control. 2009. PMID: 19328364 No abstract available.

References

    1. Disposable surgical masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Reviews 2002 Issue 1. - PubMed
    1. Belkin N.L. A century after their introduction, are surgical masks necessary? AORN J. 1996;64:602–607. - PubMed
    1. Guidance for industry and FDA staff: surgical masks—premarket notification [510(k)] Submissions. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health; 2004.
    1. Test method for determining the initial efficiency of a flatsheet filter medium in an airflow using latex spheres, F1215–89. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 1989.
    1. Standard test method for determining the initial efficiency of materials used in medical face masks to penetration by particulates using latex spheres, F2299–03 West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2003.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances