Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: anatomic outcomes and complications with Pelvicol, autologous and synthetic graft materials
- PMID: 18455533
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.050
Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: anatomic outcomes and complications with Pelvicol, autologous and synthetic graft materials
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare anatomic outcomes and graft-related complications (GRCs) for abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) with Pelvicol (CR BARD, Murray Hill, NJ), autologous fascia, and synthetic grafts.
Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study of ASC from 2001-2005. We reviewed anatomic outcomes and GRCs. Apical failure was defined as >stage 0.
Results: Of 259 ASC procedures, Pelvicol was used in 102 procedures (39%); synthetic mesh in 134 procedures (52%), and autologous fascia in 23 procedures (9%). Mean postoperative follow up was 1.1 years. Apical failure by graft group were Pelvicol 10 (11%), synthetics 1 (1%), and autologous 1 (7%; P = .011). All 7 reoperations for apical prolapse were in the Pelvicol group. GRCs occurred in 16% of the cases, with a higher proportion of erosions in the Pelvicol group (11% vs 3% and 4%; P = .045). Reoperations as a result of GRC were similar between groups.
Conclusion: ASC is more likely to fail with Pelvicol than with synthetic or autologous grafts. The use of Pelvicol did not reduce graft-related complications in this population.
Similar articles
-
Abdominal sacral suspensions: analysis of complications using permanent mesh.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Dec;193(6):2094-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.066. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 16325622
-
Surgical excision of eroded mesh after prior abdominal sacrocolpopexy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):615.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.012. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 18060951
-
Modification of abdominal sacrocolpopexy using a suture anchor system.J Reprod Med. 2003 Jul;48(7):496-500. J Reprod Med. 2003. PMID: 12953322
-
The use of biological and synthetic materials in vaginal surgery for prolapse.Curr Opin Urol. 2007 Nov;17(6):408-14. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f10a2b. Curr Opin Urol. 2007. PMID: 17921775 Review.
-
The use of prosthetics in pelvic reconstructive surgery.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Dec;19(6):979-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.08.013. Epub 2005 Sep 26. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005. PMID: 16185932 Review.
Cited by
-
Sacrocolpopexy: Surgical Technique, Outcomes, and Complications.Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Dec;17(12):90. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0643-x. Curr Urol Rep. 2016. PMID: 27796653 Review.
-
Prolapse Repair Using Non-synthetic Material: What is the Current Standard?Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Oct 14;20(11):70. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0939-8. Curr Urol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31612341 Review.
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with autologous fascia lata: technique and initial outcomes.Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Nov;30(11):1965-1971. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03884-2. Epub 2019 Feb 1. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. PMID: 30707257
-
Tissue engineering as a potential alternative or adjunct to surgical reconstruction in treating pelvic organ prolapse.Int Urogynecol J. 2013 May;24(5):741-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1927-4. Epub 2012 Sep 1. Int Urogynecol J. 2013. PMID: 22940843 Review.
-
Mobility and stress analysis of different surgical simulations during a sacral colpopexy, using a finite element model of the pelvic system.Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun;27(6):951-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2917-0. Epub 2016 Jan 11. Int Urogynecol J. 2016. PMID: 26755057
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous