Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 May;198(5):557.e1-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.050.

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: anatomic outcomes and complications with Pelvicol, autologous and synthetic graft materials

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: anatomic outcomes and complications with Pelvicol, autologous and synthetic graft materials

Lieschen H Quiroz et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare anatomic outcomes and graft-related complications (GRCs) for abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) with Pelvicol (CR BARD, Murray Hill, NJ), autologous fascia, and synthetic grafts.

Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study of ASC from 2001-2005. We reviewed anatomic outcomes and GRCs. Apical failure was defined as >stage 0.

Results: Of 259 ASC procedures, Pelvicol was used in 102 procedures (39%); synthetic mesh in 134 procedures (52%), and autologous fascia in 23 procedures (9%). Mean postoperative follow up was 1.1 years. Apical failure by graft group were Pelvicol 10 (11%), synthetics 1 (1%), and autologous 1 (7%; P = .011). All 7 reoperations for apical prolapse were in the Pelvicol group. GRCs occurred in 16% of the cases, with a higher proportion of erosions in the Pelvicol group (11% vs 3% and 4%; P = .045). Reoperations as a result of GRC were similar between groups.

Conclusion: ASC is more likely to fail with Pelvicol than with synthetic or autologous grafts. The use of Pelvicol did not reduce graft-related complications in this population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types