Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May 5:8:8.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-8-8.

A systematic review of tests for lymph node status in primary endometrial cancer

Affiliations

A systematic review of tests for lymph node status in primary endometrial cancer

Tara J Selman et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: The lymph node status of a patient is a key determinate in staging, prognosis and adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer. Despite this, the potential additional morbidity associated with lymphadenectomy makes its role controversial. This study systematically reviews the accuracy literature on sentinel node biopsy; ultra sound scanning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computer tomography (CT) for determining lymph node status in endometrial cancer.

Methods: Relevant articles were identified form MEDLINE (1966-2006), EMBASE (1980-2006), MEDION, the Cochrane library, hand searching of reference lists from primary articles and reviews, conference abstracts and contact with experts in the field. The review included 18 relevant primary studies (693 women). Data was extracted for study characteristics and quality. Bivariate random-effect model meta-analysis was used to estimate diagnostic accuracy of the various index tests.

Results: MRI (pooled positive LR 26.7, 95% CI 10.6 - 67.6 and negative LR 0.29 95% CI 0.17 - 0.49) and successful sentinel node biopsy (pooled positive LR 18.9 95% CI 6.7 - 53.2 and negative LR 0.22, 95% CI 0.1 - 0.48) were the most accurate tests. CT was not as accurate a test (pooled positive LR 3.8, 95% CI 2.0 - 7.3 and negative LR of 0.62, 95% CI 0.45 - 0.86. There was only one study that reported the use of ultrasound scanning.

Conclusion: MRI and sentinel node biopsy have shown similar diagnostic accuracy in confirming lymph node status among women with primary endometrial cancer than CT scanning, although the comparisons made are indirect and hence subject to bias. MRI should be used in preference, in light of the ASTEC trial, because of its non invasive nature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection process for systematic review of literature on accuracy of tests for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The quality of studies included in systematic review of literature on accuracy of tests for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer. Stacked bar chart used. Numbers in bars indicate number of studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forrest plots of sensitivity and specificity for the various index tests. A. Sentinel node biopsy B. CT scanning C. MRI.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bivariate summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity for each of the three index tests and the corresponding 95% confidence ellipse around these mean values. Open symbols are individual studies.

References

    1. Amant F, Moeman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Limbergen E, Vergot I. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2005;366:491–505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67063-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chee JJ, Ho TH, Tay EH, Low JJH, Yam KL. Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma of the Uterus: Surgico-Pathological Correlations and Role of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. 2003;32:670–5. - PubMed
    1. Maggino T, Romagnolo C, Zola P, Sartori E, Landoni F, Gadducci A. An analysis of approaches to the treatment of endometrial cancer in Western Europe: A CTF study. European Journal of Cancer. 1995;31:1993–7. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00316-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fanning J, Firestein S. Prospective evaluation of the morbidity of complete lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 1998;8:270–3. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1998.09833.x. - DOI
    1. Khan KS, Dinnes J, Kleijnen J. Systematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests. European Journal of Obstet Gynecol Reprod biol. 2001;95:6–11. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00463-2. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types