Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May-Jun;40(3):160-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2007.04.376.

A pilot study of an online workplace nutrition program: the value of participant input in program development

Tara Cousineau  1 , Brian Houle, Jonas Bromberg, Kathrine C Fernandez, Whitney C Kling
Affiliations

A pilot study of an online workplace nutrition program: the value of participant input in program development

Tara Cousineau et al. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Tailored nutrition Web programs constitute an emerging trend in obesity prevention. Initial investment in innovative technology necessitates that the target population be well understood. This pilot study's purpose was to determine the feasibility of a workplace nutrition Web program.

Design: Formative research was conducted with gaming industry employees and benefits managers to develop a consensus on workplace-specific nutrition needs. A demonstration Web program was piloted with stakeholders to determine feasibility.

Setting: Indiana, Mississippi, Nevada, and New Jersey gaming establishments.

Participants: 86 employees, 18 benefits managers.

Intervention: Prototype Web program.

Main outcome measures: Concept mapping; 16-item nutrition knowledge test; satisfaction.

Analysis: Concept mapping was used to aggregate importance ratings on programmatic content, which informed Web program curriculum. Chi-square tests were performed postintervention to determine knowledge improvement.

Results: (1) Employees and benefits managers exhibited moderate agreement about content priorities for the program (r = 0.48). (2) There was a significant increase in employees' nutrition knowledge scores postintervention (t = 7.16, df = 36, P < .001); those with less knowledge exhibited the greatest gains in knowledge scores (r = -0.647, P < .001).

Conclusions and implications: Employees and benefit managers do not necessarily agree on the priority of nutrition-related content, suggesting a need for programs to appeal to various stakeholders. Computer-based approaches can address various stakeholder health concerns via tailored, customized programming.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Concept map. Statistical summary from the sorting of all statements by each participant “in a way that makes sense to you,” and the rating of all statements by each participant on a five-point scale on the relative importance of each item to include in a workplace website about nutrition and exercise (1=Extremely Unimportant to 5=Extremely Important). Clusters with more layers were considered relatively more important. Spatial cluster size represents how frequently participants sorted statements in a given cluster together.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rand Corporation. The Health Risks of Obesity (RB-4549) [Accessed March 6, 2008]. Available at: http://www.rand.org/publications/RB/RB4549/
    1. Sorensen G, Stoddard A, Hunt M, et al. The effects of a health promotion-health protection intervention on behavior change: The WellWorks Study. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1685–1690. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson M, DeJoy D, Jorgensen C, Crump C. Health promotion programs in small worksites: results of a national survey. Am J Health Promot. 1999;13:358–365. - PubMed
    1. Heaney CA, Goetzel RZ. A review of health-related outcomes of multi-component worksite health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 1997;11:290–308. - PubMed
    1. Pelletier KR. A review and analysis of the clinical- and cost-effectiveness studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease management programs at the worksite: 1998–2000 update. Am J Health Promot. 2001;16:107–116. - PubMed

Publication types