Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May 6;178(10):1293-301.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071068.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for unipolar depression: a systematic review of classic long-term randomized controlled trials

Affiliations

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for unipolar depression: a systematic review of classic long-term randomized controlled trials

Dorian Deshauer et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are increasingly used in the long-term treatment of depression. Much of the supporting evidence about the effects of these drugs comes from discontinuation trials, a variant of randomized controlled trials whose design is problematic to interpret. We conducted a systematic review to examine the efficacy and acceptability of long-term therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors relative to placebo in the treatment of unipolar depression.

Methods: We identified placebo-controlled randomized trials with a treatment duration of at least 6 months by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to update a recently published systematic review. Efficacy was defined in terms of response to treatment (50% improvement in depression score relative to baseline) and remission (score of 7 or below on the Hamilton rating scale for depression). Key secondary outcomes included quality of life, return to work, need for additional treatment and self-harm. Overall acceptability was defined in terms of dropouts for any reason over a course of treatment.

Results: Of the 2693 records identified initially, we included 6 randomized controlled trials that met our eligibility criteria. These studies had a moderate risk of bias, had assigned a total of 1299 participants with depression to either treatment or placebo and had followed both groups for 6-8 months. We observed statistically significant improvements in response to treatment (odds ratio [OR] 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.48), but not in remission (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.92-2.32) or acceptability (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67-1.14). The effects appeared greater among patients without comorbidities.

Interpretation: There is a lack of classic randomized controlled trials of serotonin reuptake inhibitors lasting more than 1 year for the treatment of depression. The results of our systematic review support current recommendations for 6-8 months of antidepressant treatment following initial recovery but provide no guidance for longer treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1: Two designs of randomized controlled trials used to investigate long-term antidepressant therapy.
None
Figure 2: Flow diagram for identification of classic placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials.
None
Figure 3: Pooled analysis of response to treatment (50% improvement in depression score relative to baseline) in 6 classic randomized controlled trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients with major depression. The vertical line represents no difference between compared treatments.
None
Figure 4: Pooled analysis of remission (score of 7 or below on the Hamilton rating scale for depression) in 4 classic randomized controlled trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients with major depression. The vertical line represents no difference between compared treatments.
None
Figure 5: Pooled analysis of overall acceptability (total dropouts) in 6 classic randomized controlled trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients with major depression. The vertical line represents no difference between compared treatments.

Comment in

References

    1. Raymond CB, Morgan SG, Caetano PA. Antidepressant utilization in British Columbia from 1996 to 2004: increasing prevalence but not incidence. Psychiatr Serv 2007;58:79-84. - PubMed
    1. Petty DR, House A, Knapp P, et al. Prevalence, duration and indications for prescribing of antidepressants in primary care. Age Ageing 2006;35:523-6. - PubMed
    1. Meijer WE, Heerdink ER, Leufkens HG, et al. Incidence and determinants of long-term use of antidepressants. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2004;60:57-61. - PubMed
    1. Depression: management of depression in primary and secondary care. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2004.
    1. Major depression in adults in primary care. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement; 2006.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances