Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Aug;23(8):1145-51.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0591-3. Epub 2008 May 6.

In-office discussions of migraine: results from the American Migraine Communication Study

Richard B Lipton  1 , Steven R Hahn, Roger K Cady, Jan Lewis Brandes, Suzanne E Simons, Philip A Bain, Meaghan R Nelson
Affiliations

In-office discussions of migraine: results from the American Migraine Communication Study

Richard B Lipton et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Research indicates that successful migraine assessment and treatment depends on information obtained during patient and healthcare professional (HCP) discussions. However, no studies outline how migraine is actually discussed during clinical encounters.

Objective: Record naturally occurring HCP-migraineur interactions, analyzing frequency and impairment assessment, and preventive treatment discussions.

Design: HCPs seeing high volumes of migraineurs were recruited for a communication study. Patients likely to discuss migraine were recruited immediately before their normally scheduled appointment and, once consented, were audio- and video-recorded without a researcher present. Separate post-visit interviews were conducted with patients and HCPs. All interactions were transcribed.

Participants: Sixty patients (83% female; mean age 41.7) were analyzed. Patients were diagnosed with migraine 14 years and experienced 5 per month, on average.

Approach: Transcripts were analyzed using sociolinguistic techniques such as number and type of questions asked and post-visit alignment on migraine frequency and impairment. American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study guidelines were utilized.

Results: Ninety-one percent of HCP-initiated, migraine-specific questions were closed-ended/short answer; assessments focused on frequency and did not focus on attention on impairment. Open-ended questions in patient post-visit interviews yielded robust impairment-related information. Post-visit, 55% of HCP-patient pairs were misaligned regarding frequency; 51% on impairment. Of the 20 (33%) patients who were preventive medication candidates, 80% did not receive it and 50% of their visits lacked discussion of prevention.

Conclusions: Sociolinguistic analysis revealed that HCPs often used narrowly focused, closed-ended questions and were often unaware of how migraine affected patients' lives as a result. It is recommended that HCPs assess impairment using open-ended questions in combination with the ask-tell-ask technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041007638.x', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041007638.x'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11554951', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11554951/'}]}
    2. Lipton RB, Diamond S, Reed M, Diamond ML, Stewart WF. Migraine diagnosis and treatment: results from the American Migraine Study II. Headache. 2001;4(17)638–45. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1111/j.1526-4610.1999.00006.x', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.1999.00006.x'}]}
    2. Lipton RB, Stewart RF. Acute migraine therapy: do doctors understand what patients with migraine want from therapy? Headache. 1999;39(Suppl 2)S20–6.
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11914403', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11914403/'}]}
    2. Lipton RB, Scher AI, Kolodner K, Liberman J, Steiner TJ, Stewart WF. Migraine in the United States: epidemiology and patterns of health care use. Neurology. 2002;58(6)885–94. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12583531', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12583531/'}]}
    2. Barrier PA, Li JT, Jensen NM. Two words to improve physician–patient communication: what else? Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(2)211–4. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1186/1472-6920-6-30', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-30'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC1501016', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1501016/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16729886', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16729886/'}]}
    2. Mueller PS, Barrier PA, Call TG, Duncan AK, Hurley DL, Multari A, Rabatin JT, Li JT. Views of new internal medicine faculty of their preparedness and competence in physician–patient communication. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:30. - PMC - PubMed