Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May 7;3(5):e2120.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002120.

Hung out to dry: choice of priority ecoregions for conserving threatened neotropical anurans depends on life-history traits

Affiliations

Hung out to dry: choice of priority ecoregions for conserving threatened neotropical anurans depends on life-history traits

Rafael Dias Loyola et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: In the Neotropics, nearly 35% of amphibian species are threatened by habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, and habitat split; anuran species with different developmental modes respond to habitat disturbance in different ways. This entails broad-scale strategies for conserving biodiversity and advocates for the identification of high conservation-value regions that are significant in a global or continental context and that could underpin more detailed conservation assessments towards such areas.

Methodology/principal findings: We identified key ecoregion sets for anuran conservation using an algorithm that favors complementarity (beta-diversity) among ecoregions. Using the WWF's Wildfinder database, which encompasses 700 threatened anuran species in 119 Neotropical ecoregions, we separated species into those with aquatic larvae (AL) or terrestrial development (TD), as this life-history trait affects their response to habitat disturbance. The conservation target of 100% of species representation was attained with a set of 66 ecoregions. Among these, 30 were classified as priority both for species with AL and TD, 26 were priority exclusively for species with AL, and 10 for species with TD only. Priority ecoregions for both developmental modes are concentrated in the Andes and in Mesoamerica. Ecoregions important for conserving species with AL are widely distributed across the Neotropics. When anuran life histories were ignored, species with AL were always underrepresented in priority sets.

Conclusions/significance: The inclusion of anuran developmental modes in prioritization analyses resulted in more comprehensive coverage of priority ecoregions-especially those essential for species that require an aquatic habitat for their reproduction-when compared to usual analyses that do not consider this life-history trait. This is the first appraisal of the most important regions for conservation of threatened Neotropical anurans. It is also a first endeavor including anuran life-history traits in priority area-selection for conservation, with a clear gain in comprehensiveness of the selection process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Pattern of species richness, irreplaceability and minimum ecoregion sets for representing threatened Neotropical anurans.
Spatial patterns of threatened anuran species richness across Neotropical ecoregions (A) and spatial patterns of irreplaceability estimated by the frequency of ecoregions in the 100 optimal solutions obtained with all threatened anuran species with aquatic larvae (B) and terrestrial development (C) found in the Neotropics. Map showing minimum ecoregion sets (n = 66 ecoregions) required for representation of all threatened anuran species with different developmental modes (D), both those with aquatic larvae (AL = yellow, n = 26 ecoregions) and those with terrestrial development (TD = red, n = 10 ecoregions). Ecoregions of high importance for species of both developmental modes (AL+TD, n = 50 ecoregions) are represented in orange.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Key ecoregion sets for threatened Neotropical anurans obtained with or without discriminating species according to their developmental modes.
(A–C) Maps showing the minimum ecoregion sets required for representation of species with different developmental modes, both those with aquatic larvae (AL = yellow) and those with terrestrial development (TD = red)-at different cutoff levels of species representation (95, 80, and 70%). Ecoregions of high priority for species of both developmental modes (AL+TD) are represented in orange. (E–G) Maps show minimum ecoregion sets required for representation of anuran species at different cutoff levels of species representation (95, 80, and 70%).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Conservation status of key ecoregions for the conservation of threatened Neotropical anurans.
(A) Numbers of endemic and threatened species of Neotropical anurans found in ecoregions classified as Stable/Intact, Vulnerable or Critical/Endangered, according to . (B) Distribution of the number of species found in ecoregions classified as Stable/Intact, Vulnerable or Critical/Endangered, according to . Box plots indicate the range of the data between brackets, the middle two quartiles within the box, the median value as the midline, outside (*) and far outside (°) values.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, et al. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science. 2004;306:1783–1786. - PubMed
    1. Pounds JA, Bustamante MR, Coloma LA, Consuegra JA, Fogden MPL, et al. Widespread amphibian extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global warming. Nature. 2006;439:161–167. - PubMed
    1. Frost DR. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.1 (10 October, 2007). 2007. Available: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php. Accessed: 2007 Sep 09.
    1. IUCN, Conservation International, NatureServe. Global Amphibian Assessment. 2006. Available: http://www.globalamphibians.org. Accessed: 2007 Sep 09.
    1. Young BE, Lips KR, Reaser JK, Ibanez R, Salas AW, et al. Population declines and priorities for amphibian conservation in Latin America. Conserv Biol. 2001;15:1213–1223.

Publication types