Comparison of centering pregnancy to traditional care in Hispanic mothers

Abstract

Objective: To compare maternal and infant outcomes in Hispanic women participating in the Centering Pregnancy Model (CPM) to those receiving prenatal care via the traditional model and determine acceptability of the CPM.

Methods: Forty-nine women (n = 24 CPM; n = 25 traditional) participated in this quasi-experimental prospective comparative design. Participants self selected the model of care delivery. Data were collected via questionnaires at the initial visit, 34-36 weeks gestation, and postpartum. Outcome measures included: satisfaction with care delivery model, health behaviors, prenatal/postnatal care knowledge, self-esteem and depression. Breastfeeding initiation and continuation, infant birth weight, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery and infant length of stay were also collected.

Results: Traditional participants had a history of more pregnancies, more living children, and higher levels of postpartum self-esteem compared to centering participants. Knowledge deficits and health behaviors were similar between groups. No differences were found for infant outcomes.

Conclusions: This study provides information regarding Hispanic mothers' responses to an alternative care delivery model. Preliminary evidence suggests CPM compares with traditional care and yields a high degree of patient satisfaction. Specific pregnancy-related knowledge deficits were identified in both groups that could focus prenatal education. In light of similar outcomes in both groups; patient and provider satisfaction and economics would therefore be a factor when choosing a model of prenatal care delivery.