The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: research review and implications for effective practice
- PMID: 18465366
- DOI: 10.1080/07434610701830587
The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: research review and implications for effective practice
Abstract
A research review of 31 studies pertaining to the morphology and syntax of individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and who had severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI) was completed. Results suggest that, although many individuals who use AAC exhibit comprehension and expression of a wide range of grammatical structures, these individuals are at risk for experiencing grammar deficits. A wide range of individual differences was noted, both within and across many of the investigations. One of the more robust findings was that individuals tended to produce shorter utterances when they used graphic symbol-based AAC systems than would be expected, based on participant profiles; however, there appeared to be a developmental trend toward using longer utterances. There has been a dearth of research pertaining to the development and evaluation of appropriate assessment tools and intervention techniques to enhance grammar acquisition for individuals who use AAC. Considerations for developing such tools and techniques are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part III--contributing factors.Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23(4):323-35. doi: 10.1080/02656730701189123. Augment Altern Commun. 2007. PMID: 17852054
-
Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: part II--communicative interaction.Augment Altern Commun. 2007 Mar;23(1):1-15. doi: 10.1080/07434610600720442. Augment Altern Commun. 2007. PMID: 17364484
-
Demographics of preschoolers who require AAC.Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2006 Jul;37(3):200-8. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2006/022). Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2006. PMID: 16837443
-
The use of augmentative and alternative communication methods with infants and toddlers with disabilities: a research review.Augment Altern Commun. 2009 Dec;25(4):274-86. doi: 10.3109/07434610903384529. Augment Altern Commun. 2009. PMID: 19883287 Review.
-
AAC and literacy.Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Nov 4-18;26(21-22):1305-12. doi: 10.1080/09638280412331280334. Disabil Rehabil. 2004. PMID: 15513730 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating Camera Mouse as a computer access system for augmentative and alternative communication in cerebral palsy: A case study.Assist Technol. 2024 May 3;36(3):217-223. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2023.2242893. Epub 2023 Sep 12. Assist Technol. 2024. PMID: 37699111 Free PMC article.
-
Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Children with Intellectual and Developmental Disability: A Mega-Review of the Literature.J Dev Phys Disabil. 2022;34(1):1-42. doi: 10.1007/s10882-021-09790-0. Epub 2021 Mar 31. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2022. PMID: 33814873 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Conversation-based intervention for adolescents using augmentative and alternative communication.Augment Altern Commun. 2018 Sep;34(3):180-193. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1490926. Epub 2018 Jul 25. Augment Altern Commun. 2018. PMID: 30043650 Free PMC article.
-
Using dynamic assessment to evaluate the expressive syntax of children who use augmentative and alternative communication.Augment Altern Commun. 2015 Mar;31(1):1-14. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2014.995779. Epub 2015 Jan 26. Augment Altern Commun. 2015. PMID: 25621928 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for childhood apraxia of speech.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 30;5(5):CD006278. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006278.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29845607 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical