Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;1 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S134.
doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-1-s1-s134. Epub 2007 Dec 18.

A two-step multiple-marker strategy for genome-wide association studies

Affiliations

A two-step multiple-marker strategy for genome-wide association studies

Hugues Aschard et al. BMC Proc. 2007.

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies raise study-design and analytical issues that are still being debated. Among them, stands the issue of reducing the number of markers to be genotyped without loss of efficiency in identifying trait loci, which can reduce the cost of studies and minimize the multiple testing problem. With this aim, we proposed a two-step strategy based on two analytical methods suited to examine sets of markers rather than single markers: the local score, which screens the genome to select candidate regions in Step 1, and FBAT-LC, a multiple-marker family-based association test used to obtain significance levels of regions at step 2. The performance of this strategy was evaluated on all replicates of Genetic Analysis Workshop 15 Problem 3 simulated data, using the answers to that problem. Overall, seven of the nine generated trait loci were detected in at least 87% of the replicates using a framework designed to handle either association with the disease or association with the severity of disease. This multiple-marker strategy was compared to the single-marker approach. By considering regions instead of single markers, this strategy minimizes the multiple testing problem and the number of false-positive results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the local scores method. A, scores Xi (e.g., Pearson chi-squared statistics for case-control genotype frequencies) at marker locations along a chromosome. B, Scores Xi at marker locations along a chromosome; Xi = Xi - δ, δ being the value of statistic Xi at the 5% level.

References

    1. Skol AD, Scott LJ, Abecasis GR, Boehnke M. Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38:209–213. doi: 10.1038/ng1706. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Steen K, McQueen MB, Herbert A, Raby B, Lyon H, DeMeo DL, Murphy A, Su J, Datta S, Rosenow C, Christman M, Silverman EK, Laird NM, Weiss ST, Lange C. Genomic screening and replication using the same data set in family-based association testing. Nat Genet. 2005;37:683–691. doi: 10.1038/ng1582. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang H, Thomas DC, Pe'er I, Stram DO. Optimal two-stage genotyping designs for genome-wide association scans. Genet Epidemiol. 2006;30:356–368. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20150. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cordell HJ, Clayton DG. Genetic association studies. Lancet. 2005;366:1121–1131. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67424-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xu X, Rakovski C, Xu X, Laird N. An efficient family-based association test using multiple markers. Genet Epidemiol. 2006;30:620–626. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20174. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources