Functional comparison between double and triple ileal loop pouches
- PMID: 1846798
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02050201
Functional comparison between double and triple ileal loop pouches
Abstract
Ileal pouch function in 35 patients operated upon by the same surgeon were compared. Seventeen of the patients had a double loop (J) ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and 18 a triple loop (S) pouch. The patients were examined a mean of 27.9 months and 5.1 months, respectively, after ileostomy closure. Ten of the S-pouch patients were evaluated more than 6 months (S greater than 6 months), mean 9.1 after ileostomy closure. There were no differences in the mean maximum resting pressures or maximum squeeze pressures between the groups. The incidence of daytime and nocturnal leakage was lower in the S-pouch group, 22 and 29 percent, than in the J group 29, and 53 percent. Though the mean maximum tolerated volume (MTV) of the S-pouch group was greater than the J group, the difference was not statistically significant. The difference in the mean compliance between the J- and S-pouch groups and the J and S greater than 6 months group was statistically significant (P less than 0.01) and (P less than 0.008). All the patients could evacuate spontaneously. The difference in the 24-hour frequency of defecation between the S greater than 6 months and J group was significant (P less than 0.05), but not between the S and J groups. The median frequency of nocturnal defecation between the S greater than 6 months and J pouch groups was significant (P less than 0.005), but not between the S and J groups. The triple loop S-pouches were more compliant than the J-pouches and had a better functional result as shown by a lower incidence of nocturnal leakage, and a lower frequency of defecation during the day and night.
Similar articles
-
Anal sphincter function after intersphincteric resection and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Jan;34(1):8-16. doi: 10.1007/BF02050200. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991. PMID: 1846800
-
Impact of anal manipulation and pouch design on ileal pouch function.J Natl Med Assoc. 1991 Dec;83(12):1089-92. J Natl Med Assoc. 1991. PMID: 1813639 Free PMC article.
-
Stapled ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis without a temporary diverting ileostomy.Ann Surg. 1991 Jun;213(6):606-17; discussion 617-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199106000-00011. Ann Surg. 1991. PMID: 2039292 Free PMC article.
-
[Anorectal manometry and ileo-anal anastomosis].Ann Chir. 1991;45(6):462-5. Ann Chir. 1991. PMID: 1656839 French.
-
Motor function of the ileal J pouch and its relation to clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.World J Surg. 1987 Dec;11(6):735-41. doi: 10.1007/BF01656596. World J Surg. 1987. PMID: 3324500 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Reduced pouch capacitance due to gynaecological pathology.Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992 Dec;7(4):230. doi: 10.1007/BF00341228. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992. PMID: 1293246 No abstract available.
-
The role of scintigraphic defecography in the assessment of bowel function after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006 Jul;21(5):448-52. doi: 10.1007/s00384-005-0036-y. Epub 2006 Mar 24. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006. PMID: 16557376
-
Serum biochemical evaluation of patients with functional pouches ten to 20 years after restorative proctocolectomy.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006 Oct;21(7):711-20. doi: 10.1007/s00384-005-0076-3. Epub 2006 Jan 26. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006. PMID: 16437210
-
Restorative proctocolectomy: the current ochsner experience.Ochsner J. 2013 Winter;13(4):512-6. Ochsner J. 2013. PMID: 24357999 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy.Ann Surg. 1999 Oct;230(4):575-84; discussion 584-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199910000-00013. Ann Surg. 1999. PMID: 10522727 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical