Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May 15;121(Pt 10):1577-86.
doi: 10.1242/jcs.005959.

The RanGTP gradient - a GPS for the mitotic spindle

Affiliations

The RanGTP gradient - a GPS for the mitotic spindle

Petr Kalab et al. J Cell Sci. .

Abstract

The GTPase Ran has a key role in nuclear import and export, mitotic spindle assembly and nuclear envelope formation. The cycling of Ran between its GTP- and GDP-bound forms is catalyzed by the chromatin-bound guanine nucleotide exchange factor RCC1 and the cytoplasmic Ran GTPase-activating protein RanGAP. The result is an intracellular concentration gradient of RanGTP that equips eukaryotic cells with a ;genome-positioning system' (GPS). The binding of RanGTP to nuclear transport receptors (NTRs) of the importin beta superfamily mediates the effects of the gradient and generates further downstream gradients, which have been elucidated by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) imaging and computational modeling. The Ran-dependent GPS spatially directs many functions required for genome segregation by the mitotic spindle during mitosis. Through exportin 1, RanGTP recruits essential centrosome and kinetochore components, whereas the RanGTP-induced release of spindle assembly factors (SAFs) from importins activates SAFs to nucleate, bind and organize nascent spindle microtubules. Although a considerable fraction of cytoplasmic SAFs is active and RanGTP induces only partial further activation near chromatin, bipolar spindle assembly is robustly induced by cooperativity and positive-feedback mechanisms within the network of Ran-activated SAFs. The RanGTP gradient is conserved, although its roles vary among different cell types and species, and much remains to be learned regarding its functions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Network of interactions and reactions in the Ran pathway and the downstream cascade of gradients. (A) Coupling of the RanGTP signal to the dynamics of NTR-cargo interactions in the mitotic cell. The driving force is the steep gradient of free RanGTP, which is produced by RCC1 on the chromatin and dissipated by diffusion-limited reactions that include RanGAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis on Ran and the interactions of free RanGTP with NTRs. For simplicity, multi-step reactions are condensed into one step and only one NTR, importin β, is included. Ran is charged with GTP in a RCC1-catalyzed reaction on the surface of the chromatin and diffuses to the cytoplasm where it is either immediately converted to RanGDP in a reaction catalyzed by RanGAP, or interacts with abundant competing cytoplasmic NTRs. Binding ofRanGTP to the importin β-SAF complex produces a RanGTP-importin β complex and liberates an active SAF. RBDs dissociate RanGTP from its complex with importin β and present it for RanGAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis. The diagram is based on the Virtual Cell (http://vcell.org) model of the RanGTP gradient (Kalab et al., 2006). (B) The components of the Ran-NTR system form chromatin-centered concentration gradients that exist in parallel in the mitotic cytoplasm and are related to each other in a distinct regulatory order. As the spatial extent of the gradients is defined by the reactions that create and dissipate the individual molecular species and the diffusion rate of those species (Bastiaens et al., 2006; Caudron et al., 2005), the concentration gradient of the more stable RanGTP–importin-β complex is broader than that of active SAFs that have been liberated by RanGTP from importin β-SAF complexes. Note that the extent of the RanGTP–importin-β gradient is expected to be similar to that of the RanGTP–exportin-1–NES cargo complex.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Function of the mitotic Ran GPS in spindle assembly. (A) In prometaphase, major centrosomal and non-centrosomal microtubule-organizing centers are located close to mitotic chromosomes and are exposed to high RanGTP concentrations, strongly promoting the local nucleation and stabilization of microtubules that is induced by RanGTP- and importin-regulated SAFs. The SAFs bind to and become concentrated on the nascent microtubules and promote their reorganization into bipolar spindles. During spindle bipolarization, distribution of some SAFs is biased towards specific sites on spindle microtubules. The two examples shown are TPX2, which concentrates at the spindle poles, and HURP, which relocates to kinetochore fibers close to the mitotic chromosomes in bipolar spindles. RanGTP- and exportin-1-regulated mitotic cargos are recruited by cargo-specific mechanisms to centromeres (survivin), kinetochores (RanBP2-RanGAP-SUMO) and centrosomes (NPM1) – either alone (survivin) or colocalizing with exportin 1 (RanBP2-RanGAP-SUMO and NPM1). (B) Switch-like induction of mitotic spindle assembly by multiple SAFs that are incrementally activated by the RanGTP gradient. (Left) SAFs that are inhibited by binding to importins in the cytoplasm are partially activated around the chromatin by the RanGTP-gradient-induced disassembly of SAF-importin complexes (red, orange and yellow lines). As a result, multiple Ran-GPS-directed overlapping gradients of active SAFs surround the mitotic chromosomes and cooperatively promote spindle assembly as described in A. There is only partial inhibition of SAFs in the cytoplasm, but this is balanced by the activity of microtubule depolymerizers (blue lines). Some microtubule depolymerizers, such as stathamin/Op18, are inhibited by chromatin signals, further promoting the localized polymerization of microtubules. (Right) RanGTP-induced local incremental activation of SAFs, in combination with microtubule destabilizers, produces a robust switch-like activation of the mitotic spindle assembly around chromatin.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Mitotic importin β cargo gradients scale with the size of the mitotic spindle. (Left) Mitotic spindles visualized in a live HeLa cell and in X. laevis egg extract using incorporated Rhodamine-labeled tubulin. (Right) Pseudocolor image showing the signal of the Rango FRET sensor, which reports on the RanGTP-induced release of importin α and importin β cargos. The images are displayed at the same scale (scale bar, 10 μm). Adapted from Kalab et al. (Kalab et al., 2006) with permission.

References

    1. Albee AJ, Tao W and Wiese C (2006). Phosphorylation of maskin by Aurora-A is regulated by RanGTP and importin beta. J. Biol. Chem 281, 38293–38301. - PubMed
    1. Altieri DC (2006). The case for survivin as a regulator of microtubule dynamics and cell-death decisions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 18, 609–615. - PubMed
    1. Arnaoutov A and Dasso M (2005). Ran-GTP regulates kinetochore attachment in somatic cells. Cell Cycle 4, 1161–1165. - PubMed
    1. Arnaoutov A, Azuma Y, Ribbeck K, Joseph J, Boyarchuk Y, Karpova T, McNally J and Dasso M (2005). Crml is a mitotic effector of Ran-GTP in somatic cells. Nat. Cell Biol 7, 626–632. - PubMed
    1. Askjaer P, Galy V, Hannak E and Mattaj IW (2002). Ran GTPase cycle and importins alpha and beta are essential for spindle formation and nuclear envelope assembly in living Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Mol. Biol Cell 13, 4355–4370. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms