Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr 15;1(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-1-4.

Integration options for high energy efficiency and improved economics in a wood-to-ethanol process

Affiliations

Integration options for high energy efficiency and improved economics in a wood-to-ethanol process

Per Sassner et al. Biotechnol Biofuels. .

Abstract

Background: There is currently a steady increase in the use of wood-based fuels for heat and power production in Sweden. A major proportion of these fuels could serve as feedstock for ethanol production. In this study various options for the utilization of the solid residue formed during ethanol production from spruce, such as the production of pellets, electricity and heat for district heating, were compared in terms of overall energy efficiency and production cost. The effects of changes in the process performance, such as variations in the ethanol yield and/or the energy demand, were also studied. The process was based on SO2-catalysed steam pretreatment, which was followed by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. A model including all the major process steps was implemented in the commercial flow-sheeting program Aspen Plus, the model input was based on data recently obtained on lab scale or in a process development unit.

Results: For the five base case scenarios presented in the paper the overall energy efficiency ranged from 53 to 92%, based on the lower heating values, and a minimum ethanol selling price from 3.87 to 4.73 Swedish kronor per litre (0.41-0.50 EUR/L); however, ethanol production was performed in essentially the same way in each base case scenario. (Highly realistic) improvements in the ethanol yield and reductions in the energy demand resulted in significantly lower production costs for all scenarios.

Conclusion: Although ethanol was shown to be the main product, i.e. yielding the major part of the income, the co-product revenue had a considerable effect on the process economics and the importance of good utilization of the entire feedstock was clearly shown. With the assumed prices of the co-products, utilization of the excess solid residue for heat and power production was highly economically favourable. The study also showed that improvements in the ethanol yield and reductions in the energy demand resulted in significant production cost reductions almost independently of each other.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the proposed ethanol production process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The contribution of each product to the overall energy efficiency.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Duration diagram of a fictive but typical Swedish district heating system. The rectangle represents the cooling demand of the ethanol process. The fraction below the curve is used for district heating.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Annual costs and revenues for scenarios A-E. "Other" includes the cost of labour, maintenance and insurance. For scenarios D and E it was assumed that there is an annual demand for district heating during a period of time equivalent to 4500 hours of full capacity. During the remaining 3500 hours the heat is removed with cooling water and hence does not generate any income.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) for the proposed scenarios.

References

    1. Galbe M, Zacchi G. A review of the production of ethanol from softwood. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;59:618–628. doi: 10.1007/s00253-002-1058-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wooley R, Ruth M, Glassner D, Sheehan J. Process design and costing of bioethanol technology: A tool for determining the status and direction of research and development. Biotech Prog. 1999;15:794–803. doi: 10.1021/bp990107u. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ethanol plant in Salamanca, Spain (Abengoa Bioenergy, Inc.) http://www.abengoabioenergy.com/about/index.cfm?page=5&lang=1&headline=30
    1. Pilot plant (Iogen Inc.), Ottawa, Canada http://www.iogen.ca/company/facilities/index.html
    1. Pilot plant in Örnsköldsvik, Sweden http://www.sekab.com/default.asp?id=1137&refid=1037

LinkOut - more resources