Voice assessment: updates on perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, and endoscopic imaging methods
- PMID: 18475073
- PMCID: PMC3775647
- DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282fe96ce
Voice assessment: updates on perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, and endoscopic imaging methods
Abstract
Purpose of review: This paper describes recent advances in perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, and endoscopic imaging methods for assessing voice function.
Recent findings: We review advances from four major areas. PERCEPTUAL ASSESSMENT: Speech-language pathologists are being encouraged to use the new consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice inventory for auditory-perceptual assessment of voice quality, and recent studies have provided new insights into listener reliability issues that have plagued subjective perceptual judgments of voice quality. ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT: Progress is being made on the development of algorithms that are more robust for analyzing disordered voices, including the capability to extract voice quality-related measures from running speech segments. AERODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT: New devices for measuring phonation threshold air pressures and air flows have the potential to serve as sensitive indices of glottal phonatory conditions, and recent developments in aeroacoustic theory may provide new insights into laryngeal sound production mechanisms. ENDOSCOPIC IMAGING: The increased light sensitivity of new ultra high-speed color digital video processors is enabling high-quality endoscopic imaging of vocal fold tissue motion at unprecedented image capture rates, which promises to provide new insights into the mechanisms of normal and disordered voice production.
Summary: Some of the recent research advances in voice function assessment could be more readily adopted into clinical practice, whereas others will require further development.
Figures
References
-
- American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. [Accessed December 19, 2007.];Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Available at: http://www.asha.org/about/membership-certification/divs/div_3.htm.
-
- Kreiman J, Gerratt BR. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2000;108:1867–1876. - PubMed
-
- Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Ito M. When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2007;122:2354–2364. This is the first study that quantifies the extent to which experimental design factors affect listener variability. Cf. [4] - PubMed
-
- Shrivastav R, Sapienza CM, Nandur V. Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2005;48:323–335. This study espouses another approach to solve the listener reliability issue by applying psychometric theory. Cf. [3] - PubMed
-
- Zeitels SM, Blitzer A, Hillman RE, et al. Foresight in laryngology and laryngeal surgery: A 2020 vision. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology Supplement. 2007;198:2–16. This special supplement proposes future directions in laryngology that could be pursued and accomplished by the year 2020. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials