Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994;1(6):259-64.
doi: 10.1155/S1064744994000219.

Subcutaneous tissue: to suture or not to suture at cesarean section

Affiliations

Subcutaneous tissue: to suture or not to suture at cesarean section

V R Bohman et al. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1994.

Abstract

Objective: The null hypothesis for this investigation was that there was no difference in the frequency of wound disruption between women who had their subcutaneous tissues approximated with suture and those who did not during cesarean section.

Methods: During alternating months, consecutive women delivered by cesarean section either did (N = 716) or did not (N = 693) have their subcutaneous tissues closed with suture. All data were analyzed using chi square, Student's t-test, Fisher's exact probability test, analysis of variance, or logistic regression.

Results: A 32% decrease in the frequency of wound disruption was observed when subcutaneous tissues were brought into apposition with suture at cesarean section (P = 0.03).

Conclusions: Closure of Scarpa's and Camper's fascia with suture during cesarean section significantly decreased the frequency of wound disruption in this population.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Hosp Infect. 1984 Dec;5(4):359-70 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1971 May 1;2(5756):256-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Aug 1;128(7):803-7 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 1985 Jun;97(6):631-40 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1973 Aug;107(2):206-10 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources