Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993;1(1):27-31.
doi: 10.1155/S1064744993000079.

Abdominal wound problems after hysterectomy with electrocautery vs. scalpel subcutaneous incision

Affiliations

Abdominal wound problems after hysterectomy with electrocautery vs. scalpel subcutaneous incision

D L Hemsell et al. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1993.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between postoperative abdominal incision problems and opening subcutaneous tissues with electrocautery or scalpel. Women scheduled for elective abdominal hysterectomy who gave informed consent were randomly assigned to subcutaneous abdominal wall tissue incision by electrocautery or scalpel. Postoperative abdominal wound problem diagnoses included seroma, hematoma, infection, or dehiscence without identifiable etiology. Fifteen of 380 women (3.9%) developed a wound problem; six had scalpel and nine had electrosurgical subcutaneous incisions (P = 0.4). Thicker subcutaneous tissues (P = 0.04) and concurrent pelvic infection (P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for postoperative wound problems. Only two women (0.5%) developed an infection. We conclude that the method of subcutaneous tissue incision was unrelated to the development of postoperative abdominal incision problems in 380 women undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1980 May;55(5 Suppl):203S-206S - PubMed
    1. Eur Surg Res. 1980;12(6):439-43 - PubMed
    1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 May;89(5):781-4; discussion 785-6 - PubMed
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 1980 Feb;60(1):27-40 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1990 Jun;77(6):626-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources