Determinants of demand: method selection and provider preference among US women seeking abortion services
- PMID: 18477487
- PMCID: PMC5515366
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.02.003
Determinants of demand: method selection and provider preference among US women seeking abortion services
Abstract
Background: Medication abortion has the potential to increase abortion availability, primarily through new provider networks; however, without a better understanding of how and why women make decisions regarding both their abortion method and their provider, expansion efforts may be misguided and valuable resources may be wasted.
Study design: We undertook an exploratory study to investigate method and provider preferences. Semistructured one-on-one interviews were conducted with 205 abortion clients at three family planning clinics.
Results: Study participants greatly preferred the clinic setting for their abortion; the majority of women in the study would not have gone to their regular physician if they had been given the option. In addition, method choice trumps provider choice for the majority of women who would have preferred their regular provider. Participants who chose the aspiration procedure were more likely to have previous knowledge about the medication method. Travel time was not a predictor of preferring one's regular physician over the clinic.
Conclusions: Expanding provider networks via the private sector is unlikely to be a panacea. In addition to these efforts, more attention may need to be paid to addressing logistic barriers to access. Physicians offering abortion services need to let their patients know they offer such services prior to their patients' need for them. Questions remain regarding the information being circulated about medication abortion.
Comment in
-
Re. Determinants of demand: method selection and provider preference among US women seeking abortion services.Contraception. 2008 Dec;78(6):513; author reply 513-4. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Aug 28. Contraception. 2008. PMID: 19014799 No abstract available.
References
-
- Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38:90–6. - PubMed
-
- Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003;35:6–15. - PubMed
-
- NARAL Pro-Choice America Foundation, NARAL Pro-Choice America. Who decides? The status of women’s reproductive rights in the United States. 16. Washington, DC: NARAL Pro-Choice America; 2007.
-
- Grimes DA. Clinicians who provide abortions: the thinning ranks. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:719–23. - PubMed
-
- National Abortion Federation (NAF) Clinical policy guidelines. Washington, DC: National Abortion Federation (NAF); 2005.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
