Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2008 Jun;57(6):756-63.
doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.142810.

Prevalence and risk factors for abdominal bloating and visible distention: a population-based study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Prevalence and risk factors for abdominal bloating and visible distention: a population-based study

X Jiang et al. Gut. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Abdominal bloating and visible distention are common yet poorly understood symptoms. Epidemiological data distinguishing visible distention from bloating are not available. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and potential risk factors for abdominal bloating and visible distention separately in a representative US population, and their association with other functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs).

Methods: The validated Talley Bowel Disease Questionnaire was mailed to a cohort selected at random from the population of Olmsted County, Minnesota. The complete medical records of responders were abstracted; 2259 subjects (53% females; mean age 62 years) provided bloating and distention data.

Results: The age and sex-adjusted (US White 2000) overall prevalence per 100 for bloating was 19.0 [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.9 to 21.2] vs 8.9 (95% CI, 7.2 to 10.6) for visible distention. Significantly increased odds for bloating alone and separately for distention (vs neither) were detected in females, and in those with higher overall Somatic Symptom Checklist (SSC) scores and higher scores of each individual SSC item. Further, females [odds ratio (OR), 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.1], higher SSC score (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.8), constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.1), dyspepsia (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.2), and gastro-intestinal symptom complex overlap (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.7) significantly increased odds for distention over bloating alone.

Conclusions: Bloating and distention are common and have similar risk factors; somatisation probably plays a role.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of sampling techniques used in the study. *Note that there were 11 misclassified patients who said “yes” to the bloating with distention question but “no” to the bloating question who were added into the distention group. The exact wording of the questions assessing bloating and visible distention from the questionnaire is included in the shaded boxes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The proportion of abdominal bloating and visible distention among FGIDs, GORD as well as in subjects with none of these disorders (no FGIDs). The lower part of each column shows the proportion with distention. The GI overlap group included all subjects with complex symptoms meeting the criteria for more than one of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional constipation (FC), functional dyspepsia (FD) and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). GI, gastrointestinal; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-C, constipation-predominant IBS; IBS-D, diarrhoea-predominant IBS.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Potential risk factors for (A) bloating alone vs normal (B) visible distention vs normal, and (C) distention vs bloating alone among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for age, gender, somatic symptom checklist (SSC) score; age, gender and SSC score each adjusted for the other two factors; education refers to college graduate or professional training vs high school. BMI, body mass index; SSC, Somatic Symptom Checklist.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Distribution of only IBS, only dyspepsia, only FC, only GORD and GI complex overlap subjects as well as subjects with none of these disorders (no FGIDs) in groups with bloating alone, distention and no bloating/distention (no B/D) in Olmsted County, Minnesota. (B) Distribution of any IBS subtype (IBS-D; IBS-C, IBS-M and IBS-U) in group with bloating alone, distention and no bloating/distention (B/D) in Olmsted County, Minnesota. The numbers in brackets behind the series legend are absolute case numbers of each disorder in bloating/distention/no bloating or distention groups. FC, functional constipation; FGIDs, functional gastro-intestinal disorders; GI, gastro-intestinal; GORD, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-C, constipation-predominant IBS; IBS-D, diarrhoea-predominant IBS; IBS-M, mixed IBS (meets the criteria for both IBS-C and IBS-D); IBS-U, unsubtyped IBS (not meeting the criteria for the other three categories.

References

    1. Houghton LA, Whorwell PJ. Towards a better understanding of abdominal bloating and distension in functional gastrointestinal disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005;17:500–11. - PubMed
    1. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, et al. Functional bowel disorders. In: Drossman DA, editor. ROME II.I The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. third edn. Degnon Associates, Inc.; Mclean, Virginia: 2006. pp. 487–555.
    1. Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA, et al. Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut. 1999;45(Suppl 2):II43–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Talley NJ, Dennis EH, Schettler-Duncan VA, et al. Overlapping upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome patients with constipation or diarrhea. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2454–9. - PubMed
    1. Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA, et al. Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. In: Drossman DA, Talley NJ, Thompson WG, Whitehead WE, Corazza GR, editors. Rome II. Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Treatment. second edn. Degnon Associates, Inc; Mclean, VA: 2000. pp. 351–432.

Publication types