Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jan;9(1):2-7.
doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000298644.13882.88.

Parents' perspectives on physician-parent communication near the time of a child's death in the pediatric intensive care unit

Collaborators, Affiliations

Parents' perspectives on physician-parent communication near the time of a child's death in the pediatric intensive care unit

Kathleen L Meert et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Communicating bad news about a child's illness is a difficult task commonly faced by intensive care physicians. Greater understanding of parents' scope of experiences with bad news during their child's hospitalization will help physicians communicate more effectively. Our objective is to describe parents' perceptions of their conversations with physicians regarding their child's terminal illness and death in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Design: A secondary analysis of a qualitative interview study.

Setting: Six children's hospitals in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network.

Participants: Fifty-six parents of 48 children who died in the PICU 3-12 months before the study.

Interventions: Parents participated in audio recorded semistructured telephone interviews. Interviews were analyzed using established qualitative methods.

Measurements and main results: Of the 56 parents interviewed, 40 (71%) wanted to provide feedback on the way information about their child's terminal illness and death was communicated by PICU physicians. The most common communication issue identified by parents was the physicians' availability and attentiveness to their informational needs. Other communication issues included honesty and comprehensiveness of information, affect with which information was provided, withholding of information, provision of false hope, complexity of vocabulary, pace of providing information, contradictory information, and physicians' body language.

Conclusions: The way bad news is discussed by physicians is extremely important to most parents. Parents want physicians to be accessible and to provide honest and complete information with a caring affect, using lay language, and at a pace in accordance with their ability to comprehend. Withholding prognostic information from parents often leads to false hopes and feelings of anger, betrayal, and distrust. Future research is needed to investigate whether the way bad news is discussed influences psychological adjustment and family functioning among bereaved parents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Eggly S, Penner L, Albrecht TL, et al. Discussing bad news in the outpatient oncology clinic: Rethinking current communication guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:716–719. - PubMed
    1. Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwirble WT, et al. on behalf of the Robert Wood Foundation ICU End-of-Life Peer Group. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: An epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med. 2004;320:638–643. - PubMed
    1. Sahler OJZ, Frager G, Levetown M, et al. Medical education about end-of-life care in the pediatric setting: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Pediatrics. 2000;105:575–584. - PubMed
    1. Field MJ, Behrman RE, editors. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2003. - PubMed
    1. Kolarik RC, Walker G, Arnold RM. Pediatric resident education in palliative care: A needs assessment. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1949–1954. - PubMed

Publication types