Minimally invasive dynamic hip screw for fixation of hip fractures
- PMID: 18478227
- PMCID: PMC2899045
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0565-4
Minimally invasive dynamic hip screw for fixation of hip fractures
Abstract
We compared a minimally invasive surgical technique to the conventional (open approach) surgical technique used in fixation of hip fractures with the dynamic hip screw (DHS) device. Using a case-control design (44 cases and 44 controls), we tested the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the two techniques in the following outcome measures: duration of surgery, time to mobilisation and weight bearing postoperatively, length of hospital stay, mean difference of pre- and postoperative haemoglobin levels, position of the lag screw of the DHS device in the femoral head, and the tip-apex distance. The minimally invasive DHS technique had significantly shorter duration of surgery and length of hospital stay. There was also less blood loss in the minimally invasive DHS technique. The minimally invasive DHS technique produces better outcome measures in the operating time, length of hospital stay, and blood loss compared to the conventional approach while maintaining equal fixation stability.
Ce travail a pour but de comparer les techniques de fixation de fractures de la hanche par voie mini-invasive ou par voie d’abord conventionnelle avec utilisation de matériel de type DHS. Nous avons pour cette étude regroupé les patients en deux groupes, 44 cas par voie mini-invasive et 44 cas contrôle. Nous avons voulu tester l’hypothèse suivante: existe-t-il une différence entre ces deux techniques, sur la durée d’intervention, de reprise de l’appui post-opératoire; de durée moyenne de séjour des pertes sanguines notamment et enfin, en ce qui concerne la position de la vis céphalique dans la tête fémorale et sa distance par rapport à l’interligne. La technique mini-invasive entraîne de façon significative un temps chirurgical diminué et une diminution de la durée moyenne de séjour. Ceci est également vrai pour les pertes sanguines. Cette technique est pour nous supérieure en ce qui concerne ces items si on la compare à l’abord de type conventionnel en sachant que les problèmes de stabilité du matériel sont identiques quelle que soit la technique utilisée.
Similar articles
-
Mini-invasive nail versus DHS to fix pertrochanteric fractures: a case-control study.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Dec;95(8):592-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.08.007. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009. PMID: 19945367
-
Prospective randomized comparison between a dynamic hip screw and a mini-invasive static nail in fractures of the trochanteric area: preliminary results.J Orthop Trauma. 2001 Aug;15(6):401-6. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200108000-00004. J Orthop Trauma. 2001. PMID: 11514766 Clinical Trial.
-
Proximal femoral nail antirotation against dynamic hip screw for unstable trochanteric fractures; a prospective randomized comparison.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Aug;41(4):393-400. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0463-y. Epub 2014 Oct 31. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015. PMID: 26037995 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of tip apex distance and cut-out complications between helical blades and lag screws in intertrochanteric fractures among the elderly: a meta-analysis.J Orthop Sci. 2015 Nov;20(6):1062-9. doi: 10.1007/s00776-015-0770-0. J Orthop Sci. 2015. PMID: 26481124 Review.
-
What's new in hip fractures? Current concepts.Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2005 Feb;34(2):66-74. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2005. PMID: 15789524 Review.
Cited by
-
Internal fixation of pertrochanteric fractures using DHS with a two-hole side-plate.Int Orthop. 2010 Aug;34(6):877-82. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0840-z. Int Orthop. 2010. PMID: 19730862 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of minimally invasive osteosynthesis of intertrochanteric fractures with dynamic hip screw: A prospective case series.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Feb 25;27:101824. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101824. eCollection 2022 Apr. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022. PMID: 35251935 Free PMC article.
-
[Research progress in osteonecrosis of femoral head following femoral intertrochanteric fractures in adults].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Nov 15;34(11):1458-1461. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202002111. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 33191706 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Comparison between Conventional and Minimally Invasive Dynamic Hip Screws for Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur.ISRN Orthop. 2013 Aug 26;2013:484289. doi: 10.1155/2013/484289. eCollection 2013. ISRN Orthop. 2013. PMID: 24959361 Free PMC article.
-
Orthogeriatric care: improving patient outcomes.Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Jun 24;11:843-56. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S72436. eCollection 2016. Clin Interv Aging. 2016. PMID: 27445466 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1058–1064. - PubMed
-
- Boufous S, Finch CF, Lord SR. Incidence of hip fracture in New South Wales: Are our efforts having an effect? Med J Aust. 2004;180:623–626. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous