Comparison between pernasal flocked swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates for detection of common respiratory viruses in samples from children
- PMID: 18480225
- PMCID: PMC2446924
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00369-08
Comparison between pernasal flocked swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates for detection of common respiratory viruses in samples from children
Abstract
In this prospective study we compared the use of pernasal flocked swab samples with the use of nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) samples for the detection of respiratory viruses from 455 children less than 5 years of age. Overall, the sensitivity and the specificity of the pernasal flocked swab samples were 98.5% and 100%, respectively. The excellent sensitivity of the flocked swab samples in combination with the rapid means by which they may be collected makes them an alternative to NPA samples, whose collection is more invasive.
References
-
- Ahluwalia, G., J. Embree, P. McNicol, B. Law, and G. W. Hammond. 1987. Comparison of nasopharyngeal aspirate and nasopharyngeal swab specimens for respiratory syncytial virus diagnosis by cell culture, indirect immunofluorescence assay, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25763-767. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Barnes, S. D., J. M. Leclair, M. S. Forman, T. R. Townsend, G. M. Laughlin, and P. Charache. 1989. Comparison of nasal brush and nasopharyngeal aspirate techniques in obtaining specimens for detection of respiratory syncytial viral antigen by immunofluorescence. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 8598-601. - PubMed
-
- Cruz, J. R., E. Quinonez, A. de Fernandez, and F. Peralta. 1987. Isolation of viruses from nasopharyngeal secretions: comparison of aspiration and swabbing as means of sample collection. J. Infect. Dis. 156415-416. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical